public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	gmx@google.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf/core: Add an ioctl to get a number of lost samples
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:04:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRPnCLyn9oE540gM@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210811062135.1332927-1-namhyung@kernel.org>

On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 11:21:35PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Sometimes we want to know an accurate number of samples even if it's
> lost.  Currenlty PERF_RECORD_LOST is generated for a ring-buffer which
> might be shared with other events.  So it's hard to know per-event
> lost count.
> 
> Add event->lost_samples field and PERF_EVENT_IOC_LOST_SAMPLES to
> retrieve it from userspace.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/perf_event.h      | 2 ++
>  include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 1 +
>  kernel/events/core.c            | 9 +++++++++
>  kernel/events/ring_buffer.c     | 5 ++++-
>  4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index f5a6a2f069ed..44d72079c77a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -756,6 +756,8 @@ struct perf_event {
>  	struct pid_namespace		*ns;
>  	u64				id;
>  
> +	atomic_t			lost_samples;
> +
>  	u64				(*clock)(void);
>  	perf_overflow_handler_t		overflow_handler;
>  	void				*overflow_handler_context;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> index bf8143505c49..24397799127d 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -505,6 +505,7 @@ struct perf_event_query_bpf {
>  #define PERF_EVENT_IOC_PAUSE_OUTPUT		_IOW('$', 9, __u32)
>  #define PERF_EVENT_IOC_QUERY_BPF		_IOWR('$', 10, struct perf_event_query_bpf *)
>  #define PERF_EVENT_IOC_MODIFY_ATTRIBUTES	_IOW('$', 11, struct perf_event_attr *)
> +#define PERF_EVENT_IOC_LOST_SAMPLES		_IOR('$', 12, __u64 *)

would it be better to use the read syscall for that?
  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210622153918.688500-5-jolsa@kernel.org/

that patchset ended up on me not having a way to reproduce the
issue you guys wanted the fix for ;-) the lost count is there
as well

jirka

>  
>  enum perf_event_ioc_flags {
>  	PERF_IOC_FLAG_GROUP		= 1U << 0,
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index 0e125ae2fa92..a4d6736b6594 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -5664,6 +5664,15 @@ static long _perf_ioctl(struct perf_event *event, unsigned int cmd, unsigned lon
>  
>  		return perf_event_modify_attr(event,  &new_attr);
>  	}
> +
> +	case PERF_EVENT_IOC_LOST_SAMPLES: {
> +		u64 lost = atomic_read(&event->lost_samples);
> +
> +		if (copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &lost, sizeof(lost)))
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
>  	default:
>  		return -ENOTTY;
>  	}
> diff --git a/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
> index 52868716ec35..06d7dacb05da 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -172,8 +172,10 @@ __perf_output_begin(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
>  		goto out;
>  
>  	if (unlikely(rb->paused)) {
> -		if (rb->nr_pages)
> +		if (rb->nr_pages) {
>  			local_inc(&rb->lost);
> +			atomic_inc(&event->lost_samples);
> +		}
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -254,6 +256,7 @@ __perf_output_begin(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
>  
>  fail:
>  	local_inc(&rb->lost);
> +	atomic_inc(&event->lost_samples);
>  	perf_output_put_handle(handle);
>  out:
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
> -- 
> 2.32.0.605.g8dce9f2422-goog
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-11 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-11  6:21 [RFC] perf/core: Add an ioctl to get a number of lost samples Namhyung Kim
2021-08-11 13:12 ` Andi Kleen
2021-08-11 15:04 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2021-08-11 19:33   ` Stephane Eranian
2021-08-11 19:57     ` Jiri Olsa
2021-08-11 20:57       ` Namhyung Kim
2021-08-11 23:57         ` Stephane Eranian
2021-08-11 20:54   ` Namhyung Kim
2021-08-24 14:02     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-24 17:55       ` Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YRPnCLyn9oE540gM@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=gmx@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox