From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Wang Jianchao <jianchao.wan9@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/5] ext4: get discard out of jbd2 commit kthread contex
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 15:46:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRV6qqZcsNBHZzyn@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210724074124.25731-5-jianchao.wan9@gmail.com>
On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 03:41:23PM +0800, Wang Jianchao wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index 34be2f07449d..a496509e61b7 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -3474,6 +3530,14 @@ int ext4_mb_release(struct super_block *sb)
> struct kmem_cache *cachep = get_groupinfo_cache(sb->s_blocksize_bits);
> int count;
>
> + if (test_opt(sb, DISCARD)) {
> + /*
> + * wait the discard work to drain all of ext4_free_data
> + */
> + queue_work(ext4_discard_wq, &sbi->s_discard_work);
> + flush_work(&sbi->s_discard_work);
I agree with Jan --- it's not clear to me why the call to queue_work()
is needed. After the flush_work() call returns, if s_discard_work is
still non-empty, there must be something terribly wrong --- are we
missing something?
> @@ -3672,8 +3724,14 @@ int __init ext4_init_mballoc(void)
> if (ext4_free_data_cachep == NULL)
> goto out_ac_free;
>
> + ext4_discard_wq = alloc_workqueue("ext4discard", WQ_UNBOUND, 0);
> + if (!ext4_discard_wq)
> + goto out_free_data;
> +
Perhaps we should only allocate the workqueue when it's needed ---
e.g., when a file system is mounted or remounted with "-o discard"?
Then in ext4_exit_malloc(), we only free it if ext4_discard_wq is
non-NULL.
This would save a bit of memory on systems that wouldn't need the ext4
discard work queue.
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-12 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-24 7:41 [PATCH V3 0/5] ext4: get discard out of jbd2 commit context Wang Jianchao
2021-07-24 7:41 ` [PATCH V3 1/5] ext4: remove the 'group' parameter of ext4_trim_extent Wang Jianchao
2021-07-26 3:42 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-08-04 15:26 ` Jan Kara
2021-07-24 7:41 ` [PATCH V3 2/5] ext4: add new helper interface ext4_try_to_trim_range() Wang Jianchao
2021-08-04 15:29 ` Jan Kara
2021-08-12 17:44 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-08-26 7:19 ` Wang Jianchao
2021-07-24 7:41 ` [PATCH V3 3/5] ext4: remove the repeated comment of ext4_trim_all_free Wang Jianchao
2021-08-04 15:27 ` Jan Kara
2021-07-24 7:41 ` [PATCH V3 4/5] ext4: get discard out of jbd2 commit kthread contex Wang Jianchao
2021-08-04 15:45 ` Jan Kara
2021-08-26 7:15 ` Wang Jianchao
2021-08-12 19:46 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2021-08-26 7:51 ` Wang Jianchao
2021-08-26 8:58 ` Wang Jianchao
2021-07-24 7:41 ` [PATCH V3 5/5] ext4: make fallocate retry when err is ENOSPC Wang Jianchao
2021-07-26 3:40 ` Guoqing Jiang
2021-07-26 7:05 ` Wang Jianchao
2021-08-04 15:52 ` Jan Kara
2021-08-26 11:42 ` Wang Jianchao
2021-08-04 15:32 ` Jan Kara
2021-08-04 15:46 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YRV6qqZcsNBHZzyn@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=jianchao.wan9@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox