public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Nguyen Dinh Phi <phind.uet@gmail.com>
Cc: jirislaby@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	syzbot+97388eb9d31b997fe1d0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: Fix data race between tiocsti() and flush_to_ldisc()
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 09:33:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRYgSZwivcPPMhrS@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210807190513.3810821-1-phind.uet@gmail.com>

On Sun, Aug 08, 2021 at 03:05:13AM +0800, Nguyen Dinh Phi wrote:
> The ops->receive_buf() may be accessed concurrently from these two
> functions.  If the driver flushes data to the line discipline
> receive_buf() method while tiocsti() is using the ops->receive_buf(),
> the data race will happen.
> 
> For example:
> tty_ioctl                       |tty_ldisc_receive_buf
>  ->tioctsi                      | ->tty_port_default_receive_buf
>                                 |  ->tty_ldisc_receive_buf
>    ->hci_uart_tty_receive       |   ->hci_uart_tty_receive
>     ->h4_recv                   |    ->h4_recv
> 
> In this case, the h4 receive buffer will be overwritten by the
> latecomer, and it cause a memory leak.

That looks to be a bug in the h4 code, if the receive_buf() call can not
be run at the same time, it should have a lock in it, right?

> Hence, change tioctsi() function to use the exclusive lock interface
> from tty_buffer to avoid the data race.

Where is the lock being grabbed from the other receive_buf() call path
to ensure that the lock is always needed here?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Nguyen Dinh Phi <phind.uet@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: syzbot+97388eb9d31b997fe1d0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> ---
>  drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> index e8532006e960..746fe13a2054 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> @@ -2307,8 +2307,10 @@ static int tiocsti(struct tty_struct *tty, char __user *p)
>  	ld = tty_ldisc_ref_wait(tty);
>  	if (!ld)
>  		return -EIO;
> +	tty_buffer_lock_exclusive(tty->port);
>  	if (ld->ops->receive_buf)
>  		ld->ops->receive_buf(tty, &ch, &mbz, 1);
> +	tty_buffer_unlock_exclusive(tty->port);

Did this fix the syzbot reported issue?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-13  7:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-07 19:05 [PATCH] tty: Fix data race between tiocsti() and flush_to_ldisc() Nguyen Dinh Phi
2021-08-13  7:33 ` Greg KH [this message]
2021-08-13 18:35   ` Phi Nguyen
2021-08-18 14:03     ` Greg KH
2021-08-22 16:09       ` Phi Nguyen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YRYgSZwivcPPMhrS@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phind.uet@gmail.com \
    --cc=syzbot+97388eb9d31b997fe1d0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox