From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Nguyen Dinh Phi <phind.uet@gmail.com>
Cc: jirislaby@kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+97388eb9d31b997fe1d0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: Fix data race between tiocsti() and flush_to_ldisc()
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 09:33:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRYgSZwivcPPMhrS@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210807190513.3810821-1-phind.uet@gmail.com>
On Sun, Aug 08, 2021 at 03:05:13AM +0800, Nguyen Dinh Phi wrote:
> The ops->receive_buf() may be accessed concurrently from these two
> functions. If the driver flushes data to the line discipline
> receive_buf() method while tiocsti() is using the ops->receive_buf(),
> the data race will happen.
>
> For example:
> tty_ioctl |tty_ldisc_receive_buf
> ->tioctsi | ->tty_port_default_receive_buf
> | ->tty_ldisc_receive_buf
> ->hci_uart_tty_receive | ->hci_uart_tty_receive
> ->h4_recv | ->h4_recv
>
> In this case, the h4 receive buffer will be overwritten by the
> latecomer, and it cause a memory leak.
That looks to be a bug in the h4 code, if the receive_buf() call can not
be run at the same time, it should have a lock in it, right?
> Hence, change tioctsi() function to use the exclusive lock interface
> from tty_buffer to avoid the data race.
Where is the lock being grabbed from the other receive_buf() call path
to ensure that the lock is always needed here?
>
> Signed-off-by: Nguyen Dinh Phi <phind.uet@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: syzbot+97388eb9d31b997fe1d0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> ---
> drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> index e8532006e960..746fe13a2054 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> @@ -2307,8 +2307,10 @@ static int tiocsti(struct tty_struct *tty, char __user *p)
> ld = tty_ldisc_ref_wait(tty);
> if (!ld)
> return -EIO;
> + tty_buffer_lock_exclusive(tty->port);
> if (ld->ops->receive_buf)
> ld->ops->receive_buf(tty, &ch, &mbz, 1);
> + tty_buffer_unlock_exclusive(tty->port);
Did this fix the syzbot reported issue?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-13 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-07 19:05 [PATCH] tty: Fix data race between tiocsti() and flush_to_ldisc() Nguyen Dinh Phi
2021-08-13 7:33 ` Greg KH [this message]
2021-08-13 18:35 ` Phi Nguyen
2021-08-18 14:03 ` Greg KH
2021-08-22 16:09 ` Phi Nguyen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YRYgSZwivcPPMhrS@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phind.uet@gmail.com \
--cc=syzbot+97388eb9d31b997fe1d0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox