Re: [PATCH] s390/unwind: use current_frame_address() to unwind current task

[Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>]

On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 07:51:06PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Sept 2021 at 16:06, Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > current_stack_pointer() simply returns current value of %r15. If
> > current_stack_pointer() caller allocates stack (which is the case in
> > unwind code) %r15 points to a stack frame allocated for callees, meaning
> > current_stack_pointer() caller (e.g. stack_trace_save) will end up in
> > the stacktrace. This is not expected by stack_trace_save*() callers and
> > causes problems.
> >
> > current_frame_address() on the other hand returns function stack frame
> > address, which matches %r15 upon function invocation. Using it in
> > get_stack_pointer() makes it more aligned with x86 implementation
> > (according to BACKTRACE_SELF_TEST output) and meets stack_trace_save*()
> > caller's expectations, notably KCSAN.
> >
> > Also make sure unwind_start is always inlined.
> >
> > Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> > Suggested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> > ---
> >  arch/s390/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
> >  arch/s390/include/asm/unwind.h     |  8 ++++----
> >  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks!