From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F73C433EF for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 22:39:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B5061058 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 22:39:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347737AbhIBWkx (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2021 18:40:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50126 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1347662AbhIBWkw (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2021 18:40:52 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com (mail-wr1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8158FC061575 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 15:39:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id m9so5368199wrb.1 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 15:39:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=philpotter-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=pOGARM/3r7XhtT2OObL4KaH9wnbE2NcOM9J9iRB5eis=; b=FwYCZty4w/TCOCpGUI8c/SCwnPqjh3Y4iLQWlMI1m6uGOMdMdpWTPErBDQ9cgMRVfj YwXFnJNbGVMBSCFp1o7WD3hMRmNXloGem1fo1C1s6AjtE2JoSHm0J06rEczF7C9QymXh LPL+dSDkccUeqcqynbdvudFcUDlTIv/X8LGiO5cmefbxheHmqQlB8fheJahONBwkUlMV M1wM90yhdFKglSznIktvg/HWpKvnXolSWd1orJoHLEsRZ/bleFY3kynjhYpWwkL8XzXD ck2CoJp4Zg7HMyViM42n7MQuGXZg2XraEf3wVkifiBcrZSRloQ1nuUmteHYNMZt7DAm7 WXuw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=pOGARM/3r7XhtT2OObL4KaH9wnbE2NcOM9J9iRB5eis=; b=V4BAHbYurly4/By1vXoT9MAw16wTp6jg7S7BBRTJcxq6DYhypu4b4wOfM95L1iM9PA 9TVA8XhEiGkFe7CU5tBkJQiD2nTyhBSVeMzo4AJFBDEQBHPCndtvfgUdttRN0t2zhiQ7 aCef/epuCDiC+fNpzzQtAgOA3v5br3bxSN7+Cdi3c/SNYFYOtmCSFSGipgpmS1RbESgA X8umtrKIgGi3SJlb78xJpKwgidmDcKZURfbnYy0/v7h2P9LehB1ibd0DHq8xO7QypTz/ sfw+02lNppAd7kdB93oI2AmX7ouBmec/o63xa3aipT+0VQ5ozBYpqWOisgwy0rfNH+1r zPoA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532rPN5APDOyJJ9143TaHeI6CgnhkgZ9iMOqJ0xKr3gBCLECqLAB TJZNOlU2YGvAia/C9nJKzQWnBg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxHOgQgkjjLjAXVnGzV819Eo+ydxq+5mNHrjVJ6JUH4M8hU0JPSh205P8Vq/YXFtzm31fWOYA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:b78d:: with SMTP id s13mr541268wre.344.1630622392132; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 15:39:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from equinox (2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.a.1.e.e.d.f.d.0.b.8.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa. [2001:8b0:dfde:e1a0::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l187sm2670605wml.39.2021.09.02.15.39.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 02 Sep 2021 15:39:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 23:39:49 +0100 From: Phillip Potter To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Arnd Bergmann , Larry Finger , Andrew Morton , Stephen Rothwell , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-staging@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Staging / IIO driver changes for 5.15-rc1 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 02:28:02PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 2:00 PM Phillip Potter wrote: > > > > I left this code in when I wrote ae7471cae00a ("staging: r8188eu: remove > > rtw_ioctl function") with the intention of modifying and reconnecting, > > once the changes to struct net_device_ops made their way into the > > staging tree. > > Oh, ok. That explains why the dead code existed. > > Yeah, I guess y9ou can resurrect it now with the new siocdevprivate model. > > I actually ended up doing that first as part of the merge, until I > noticed that the code wasn't connected in the staging tree at all and > then decided to undo my merge and just remove the dead code. > > Linus Dear Linus, Many thanks, I'll get that done. Have a great Friday/weekend. Regards, Phil