From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Zachary Mayhew <zacklukem.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@lists.kernel.org,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: fbtft: add docs for fbtft_write_spi()
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 18:18:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YUi0coGlTkQ0C5Rm@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YUixsZQ/J0dPfJqj@Zachary-Arch.localdomain>
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 09:07:13AM -0700, Zachary Mayhew wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 05:38:30PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 08:26:03AM -0700, Zachary Mayhew wrote:
> > > Subject: [PATCH] staging: fbtft: add docs for fbtft_write_spi()
> >
> > Odd, this shouldn't be in the body of the email :(
> >
> > >
> > > This patch adds documentation for fbtft_write_spi() to make its
> > > calling context clear and explain what it does.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Zachary Mayhew <zacklukem.kernel@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-io.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-io.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-io.c
> > > index de1904a443c2..985d7cf8c774 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-io.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-io.c
> > > @@ -5,6 +5,19 @@
> > > #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> > > #include "fbtft.h"
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * fbtft_write_spi() - write data to current spi
> > > + * @par: Driver data including driver &struct spi_device
> > > + * @buf: Buffer to write to spi
> > > + * @len: Length of the buffer
> > > + * Context: can sleep
> > > + *
> > > + * Builds an &struct spi_transfer and &struct spi_message object based on the
> > > + * given @buf and @len. These are then used in a call to spi_sync() which will
> > > + * write to the spi.
> > > + *
> > > + * Return: zero on success or else a negative error code
> > > + */
> > > int fbtft_write_spi(struct fbtft_par *par, void *buf, size_t len)
> > > {
> > > struct spi_transfer t = {
> > > --
> > > 2.33.0
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Is this file being imported into the kernel doc tools? If so, great, if
> > not, this isn't going to help out all that much, right?
>
> It doesn't appear to be imported at this time, as such it may not be
> necessary.
So is this change needed?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-20 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-20 15:26 [PATCH] staging: fbtft: add docs for fbtft_write_spi() Zachary Mayhew
2021-09-20 15:38 ` Greg KH
2021-09-20 16:07 ` Zachary Mayhew
2021-09-20 16:18 ` Greg KH [this message]
2021-09-20 16:37 ` Zachary Mayhew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YUi0coGlTkQ0C5Rm@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@lists.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=zacklukem.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox