linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Hao Xiang <hao.xiang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	chenyi.qiang@intel.com, shannon.zhao@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Check if bus lock vmexit was preempted
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 14:58:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YUtEraihPxsytaJc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57597778-836c-7bac-7f1d-bcdae0cd6ac4@intel.com>

On Wed, Sep 22, 2021, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> On 9/22/2021 6:02 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 18/09/21 13:30, Hao Xiang wrote:
> > > exit_reason.bus_lock_detected is not only set when bus lock VM exit
> > > was preempted, in fact, this bit is always set if bus locks are
> > > detected no matter what the exit_reason.basic is.
> > > 
> > > So the bus_lock_vmexit handling in vmx_handle_exit should be duplicated
> > > when exit_reason.basic is EXIT_REASON_BUS_LOCK(74). We can avoid it by
> > > checking if bus lock vmexit was preempted in vmx_handle_exit.
> > 
> > I don't understand, does this mean that bus_lock_detected=1 if
> > basic=EXIT_REASON_BUS_LOCK?  If so, can we instead replace the contents
> > of handle_bus_lock_vmexit with
> > 
> >      /* Do nothing and let vmx_handle_exit exit to userspace.  */
> >      WARN_ON(!to_vmx(vcpu)->exit_reason.bus_lock_detected);
> >      return 0;
> > 
> > ?
> > 
> > That would be doable only if this is architectural behavior and not a
> > processor erratum, of course.
> 
> EXIT_REASON.bus_lock_detected may or may not be set when exit reason ==
> EXIT_REASON_BUS_LOCK. Intel will update ISE or SDM to state it.
> 
> Maybe we can do below in handle_bus_lock_vmexit handler:
> 
> 	if (!to_vmx(vcpu)->exit_reason.bus_lock_detected)
> 		to_vmx(vcpu)->exit_reason.bus_lock_detected = 1;
> 
> But is manually changing the hardware reported value for software purpose a
> good thing?

In this case, I'd say yes.  Hardware having non-deterministic behavior is the not
good thing, KVM would simply be correctly the not-technically-an-erratum erratum.

Set it unconditionally and then handle everything in common path.  This has the
added advantage of having only one site that deals with KVM_RUN_X86_BUS_LOCK.

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 33f92febe3ce..aa9372452e49 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -5561,9 +5561,9 @@ static int handle_encls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)

 static int handle_bus_lock_vmexit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-       vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_X86_BUS_LOCK;
-       vcpu->run->flags |= KVM_RUN_X86_BUS_LOCK;
-       return 0;
+       /* The dedicated flag may or may not be set by hardware.  /facepalm. */
+       vcpu->exit_reason.bus_lock_detected = true;
+       return 1;
 }

 /*
@@ -6050,9 +6050,8 @@ static int vmx_handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, fastpath_t exit_fastpath)
        int ret = __vmx_handle_exit(vcpu, exit_fastpath);

        /*
-        * Even when current exit reason is handled by KVM internally, we
-        * still need to exit to user space when bus lock detected to inform
-        * that there is a bus lock in guest.
+        * Exit to user space when bus lock detected to inform that there is a
+        * bus lock in guest.
         */
        if (to_vmx(vcpu)->exit_reason.bus_lock_detected) {
                if (ret > 0)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-22 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-18 11:30 [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Check if bus lock vmexit was preempted Hao Xiang
2021-09-22 10:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-22 10:32   ` Xiaoyao Li
2021-09-22 12:40     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-23  0:59       ` Hao Xiang
2021-09-23  6:37         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-22 14:58     ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-09-23  7:15       ` Hao Xiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YUtEraihPxsytaJc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=chenyi.qiang@intel.com \
    --cc=hao.xiang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=shannon.zhao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).