From: Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
josef@toxicpanda.com, axboe@kernel.dk, hch@infradead.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, nbd@other.debian.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [patch v8 3/7] nbd: check sock index in nbd_read_stat()
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:56:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YUtSJ/bfKZ9QJUaY@pc181009.grep.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YUr1v8zylPOFFXTO@T590>
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 05:22:07PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 06:34:28PM +0800, yukuai (C) wrote:
> > On 2021/09/16 17:33, Yu Kuai wrote:
> > > The sock that clent send request in nbd_send_cmd() and receive reply
> > > in nbd_read_stat() should be the same.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/block/nbd.c | 4 ++++
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c
> > > index 614c6ab2b8fe..c724a5bd7fa4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/block/nbd.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
> > > @@ -746,6 +746,10 @@ static struct nbd_cmd *nbd_read_stat(struct nbd_device *nbd, int index)
> > > ret = -ENOENT;
> > > goto out;
> > > }
> > > + if (cmd->index != index) {
> > > + dev_err(disk_to_dev(nbd->disk), "Unexpected reply %d from different sock %d (expected %d)",
> > > + tag, index, cmd->index);
> > > + }
> > > if (cmd->cmd_cookie != nbd_handle_to_cookie(handle)) {
> > > dev_err(disk_to_dev(nbd->disk), "Double reply on req %p, cmd_cookie %u, handle cookie %u\n",
> > > req, cmd->cmd_cookie, nbd_handle_to_cookie(handle));
> > >
> >
> > Hi, Ming
> >
> > Any suggestions about this patch?
>
> I think this one relies on nbd protocol between server and client, and
> does the protocol require both request and reply xmitted via same
> socket?
As Eric already answered: yes, the request and reply are specified such
that they must be transmitted over the same socket.
For more details, you can find the protocol specification at
https://github.com/NetworkBlockDevice/nbd/blob/master/doc/proto.md
Please note that the protocol defined there has some options that are
not currently supported by the Linux nbd implementation -- specifically
the "structured reply" message format (and all that requires it) is not
implemented (yet?).
--
w@uter.{be,co.za}
wouter@{grep.be,fosdem.org,debian.org}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-22 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-16 9:33 [patch v8 0/7] handle unexpected message from server Yu Kuai
2021-09-16 9:33 ` [patch v8 1/7] nbd: don't handle response without a corresponding request message Yu Kuai
2021-09-16 9:33 ` [patch v8 2/7] nbd: make sure request completion won't concurrent Yu Kuai
2021-09-16 9:33 ` [patch v8 3/7] nbd: check sock index in nbd_read_stat() Yu Kuai
2021-09-19 10:34 ` yukuai (C)
2021-09-22 9:22 ` Ming Lei
2021-09-22 12:12 ` Eric Blake
2021-09-22 12:21 ` yukuai (C)
2021-09-22 15:56 ` Wouter Verhelst [this message]
2021-09-23 0:29 ` Ming Lei
2021-09-16 9:33 ` [patch v8 4/7] nbd: don't start request if nbd_queue_rq() failed Yu Kuai
2021-09-16 12:48 ` Ming Lei
2021-09-16 9:33 ` [patch v8 5/7] nbd: clean up return value checking of sock_xmit() Yu Kuai
2021-09-16 12:49 ` Ming Lei
2021-09-16 9:33 ` [patch v8 6/7] nbd: partition nbd_read_stat() into nbd_read_reply() and nbd_handle_reply() Yu Kuai
2021-09-16 12:53 ` Ming Lei
2021-09-16 9:33 ` [patch v8 7/7] nbd: fix uaf in nbd_handle_reply() Yu Kuai
2021-09-16 12:58 ` Ming Lei
2021-09-16 13:10 ` yukuai (C)
2021-09-16 13:55 ` Ming Lei
2021-09-16 14:05 ` yukuai (C)
2021-09-16 14:18 ` [PATCH v9] " Yu Kuai
2021-09-17 3:33 ` Ming Lei
2021-10-17 13:09 ` Jens Axboe
2021-09-23 13:33 ` [patch v8 0/7] handle unexpected message from server yukuai (C)
2021-09-29 12:54 ` yukuai (C)
2021-10-08 7:17 ` yukuai (C)
2021-10-15 8:19 ` yukuai (C)
2021-10-15 16:08 ` Josef Bacik
2021-10-17 13:09 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YUtSJ/bfKZ9QJUaY@pc181009.grep.be \
--to=w@uter.be \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox