From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4ED1C433EF for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:35:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75F860F38 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 11:35:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238159AbhJFLhR (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:37:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53550 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232211AbhJFLhP (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:37:15 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4060CC061749 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 04:35:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id v25so7852758wra.2 for ; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 04:35:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=WlB+aQwesSqg+PcbUJ65iZtpYtFLGZhjloxXmDYdamI=; b=L2cB28Z0wz5JHhrTTsd6YlPd2Blpu9lFVOJC8to1DQTlK3kM6hhcyJVTp/k3dTx2dN /KqMwAlC+HrNAYlnL0fugxZXs+WAIT149hLimQ0fogDazUC3BvCMiRctmkPbF7SqNTyY 9jKVm/8Ncj1LM7k9kWAO2dt9TmW5UrGdZnOfJDA8b38TCDDzzLnl+679dnFEfQ2gAUY3 SkyqpFOmkNOKwyTLzX5YMDZuDE5454Rk5/UIZOu3740JnBGWYauo54MZvkB6rQumBp3Y cnoDmi0ok14Uez/7gp9D0zEnO/DE4zlkNIWamTa05HbrM11NaoxAmFexZTQOYSA9mQUk yFRQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=WlB+aQwesSqg+PcbUJ65iZtpYtFLGZhjloxXmDYdamI=; b=KuLUOcdPoW8QFsC7p0XYXIw2Nzn9M1y/Aug2bKlsqYXy4i+9PRP+xDJvTE33MewR12 NBfFJHf/IOG0eqkvaSyWMdeCZq9aZyLc+LF1PgRvT91yyVnwvYa+Vr9/58ZmR6bmTCEr ep3PZwvVdPG5HB+vjjfSSeWnUWV+8yjVYN/gGq/18sorCauv76UrzhWtJgH9GAikhtf9 6jcWx6Bie+s4AcZO2sCXT1Noexx48bUu2EI6+2yULhIf8w83DZg5wEBkya7Zxpexq2Ar zQwS+PKjLx1WoWGbBUGFbqN2bKw7cUr13Gr7QDmKxYM9i8OczKDTXQrge3qk1cCpXQB7 tFvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531kQKFXoh63j5GoXrjHfJKOaVViP2bn1oHJhWsSOKl85vaqZB4P 3Ukuus7kx0JFm1XixV2ZEdFVzw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx4kB+4pSHbo38S/Hyxgkv3G5HzJVBV0fElyQQUYmWqrIKgrK7SOiuo6C3zNW2p6gI+eZbByQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:43c3:: with SMTP id q186mr9058705wma.143.1633520121547; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 04:35:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elver.google.com ([2a00:79e0:15:13:378e:f074:3bc9:383c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n186sm5079756wme.31.2021.10.06.04.35.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Oct 2021 04:35:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 13:35:15 +0200 From: Marco Elver To: Vincenzo Frascino Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Andrew Morton , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Dmitry Vyukov , Andrey Ryabinin , Alexander Potapenko , Evgenii Stepanov , Branislav Rankov , Andrey Konovalov , Lorenzo Pieralisi Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] kasan: Extend KASAN mode kernel parameter Message-ID: References: <20211004202253.27857-1-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> <20211004202253.27857-6-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211004202253.27857-6-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.5 (2021-01-21) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 09:22PM +0100, Vincenzo Frascino wrote: [...] > DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kasan_flag_stacktrace); > extern bool kasan_flag_async __ro_after_init; > +extern bool kasan_flag_asymm __ro_after_init; > > static inline bool kasan_stack_collection_enabled(void) > { > return static_branch_unlikely(&kasan_flag_stacktrace); > } > > -static inline bool kasan_async_mode_enabled(void) > +static inline bool kasan_async_fault_possible(void) > { > - return kasan_flag_async; > + return kasan_flag_async | kasan_flag_asymm; > +} > + > +static inline bool kasan_sync_fault_possible(void) > +{ > + return !kasan_flag_async | kasan_flag_asymm; > } Is the choice of bit-wise OR a typo? Because this should probably have been logical OR. In this case, functionally it shouldn't matter, but is unusual style.