public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, vdumpa@nvidia.com,
	jonathanh@nvidia.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	digetx@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] iommu/tegra-smmu: Rename struct tegra_smmu_swgroup *group to *swgrp
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 18:57:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YV8m+0qP2ibQBvNs@orome.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210914013858.31192-4-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2024 bytes --]

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 06:38:55PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> There are both tegra_smmu_swgroup and tegra_smmu_group structs
> using "group" for their pointer instances. This gets confusing
> to read the driver sometimes.
> 
> So this patch renames "group" of struct tegra_smmu_swgroup to
> "swgrp" as a cleanup. Also renames its "find" function.
> 
> Note that we already have "swgroup" being used for an unsigned
> int type variable that is inside struct tegra_smmu_swgroup, so
> it's not able to use "swgroup" but only something like "swgrp".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
> index a32ed347e25d..0f3883045ffa 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
> @@ -334,35 +334,35 @@ static void tegra_smmu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>  }
>  
>  static const struct tegra_smmu_swgroup *
> -tegra_smmu_find_swgroup(struct tegra_smmu *smmu, unsigned int swgroup)
> +tegra_smmu_find_swgrp(struct tegra_smmu *smmu, unsigned int swgroup)

This makes things inconsistent now. The tegra_smmu_find_swgroup() name
indicates that we're looking for some "swgroup" entity within an "smmu"
object. The entity that we're looking for is a struct tegra_smmu_swgroup
so I think it makes sense to use that full name in the function name.

>  {
> -	const struct tegra_smmu_swgroup *group = NULL;
> +	const struct tegra_smmu_swgroup *swgrp = NULL;

I don't think the existing naming is confusing. The variable name
"group" is consistently used for tegra_smmu_swgroup structures and there
are no cases where we would confuse them with struct tegra_smmu_group
instances.

However, I don't feel strongly about it, so I'm fine with changing the
variable names to "swgrp" if you think that makes things less confusing.

Thierry

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-07 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-14  1:38 [PATCH v6 0/6] iommu/tegra-smmu: Add pagetable mappings to debugfs Nicolin Chen
2021-09-14  1:38 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] iommu/tegra-smmu: Rename struct iommu_group *group to *grp Nicolin Chen
2021-10-07 16:43   ` Thierry Reding
2021-09-14  1:38 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] iommu/tegra-smmu: Rename struct tegra_smmu_group_soc *soc to *group_soc Nicolin Chen
2021-10-07 16:50   ` Thierry Reding
2021-10-07 20:14     ` Nicolin Chen
2021-09-14  1:38 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] iommu/tegra-smmu: Rename struct tegra_smmu_swgroup *group to *swgrp Nicolin Chen
2021-10-07 16:57   ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2021-10-07 20:29     ` Nicolin Chen
2021-09-14  1:38 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] iommu/tegra-smmu: Use swgrp pointer instead of swgroup id Nicolin Chen
2021-10-07 16:59   ` Thierry Reding
2021-09-14  1:38 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] iommu/tegra-smmu: Attach as pointer to tegra_smmu_group Nicolin Chen
2021-10-07 17:02   ` Thierry Reding
2021-09-14  1:38 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] iommu/tegra-smmu: Add pagetable mappings to debugfs Nicolin Chen
2021-09-14 13:29   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-09-14 18:49     ` Nicolin Chen
2021-09-14 19:20       ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-09-15  4:38         ` Nicolin Chen
2021-09-15 12:09           ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-09-15 12:18             ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-09-15 22:19             ` Nicolin Chen
2021-10-07 17:13   ` Thierry Reding
2021-10-07 20:41     ` Nicolin Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YV8m+0qP2ibQBvNs@orome.fritz.box \
    --to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=digetx@gmail.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com \
    --cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox