From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+488ddf8087564d6de6e2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
will@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [syzbot] upstream test error: KASAN: invalid-access Read in __entry_tramp_text_end
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:59:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YVQ5F9aT7oSEKenh@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210929085035.GA33284@C02TD0UTHF1T.local>
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 09:50:45AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 09:39:47AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 06:36:37PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > + asm volatile("417: rdmsr\n"
> > > + : EAX_EDX_RET(val, low, high)
> > > + : "c" (msr));
> > > + asm_volatile_goto(_ASM_EXTABLE(417b, %l[Efault]) :::: Efault);
> >
> > That's terrible :-) Could probably do with a comment, but might just
> > work..
>
> The compiler is well within its rights to spill/restore/copy/shuffle
> registers or modify memory between the two asm blocks (which it's liable
> to do that when optimizing this after a few layers of inlining), and
> skipping that would cause all sorts of undefined behaviour.
Ah, but in this case it'll work irrespective of that (which is why we
needs a comment!).
This is because _ASM_EXTABLE only generates data for another section.
There doesn't need to be code continuity between these two asm
statements.
As I said, this is terrible :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-29 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-04 11:57 [syzbot] upstream test error: KASAN: invalid-access Read in __entry_tramp_text_end syzbot
2021-09-17 15:03 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-09-21 16:51 ` Mark Rutland
2021-09-27 14:27 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-09-27 14:30 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-09-27 17:01 ` Mark Rutland
2021-09-27 17:18 ` Mark Rutland
2021-09-28 10:19 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2021-09-28 10:35 ` Mark Rutland
2021-09-29 1:36 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-09-29 7:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-29 8:50 ` Mark Rutland
2021-09-29 9:59 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-09-29 10:37 ` Mark Rutland
2021-09-29 11:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-30 19:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-01 12:27 ` Mark Rutland
2021-10-02 5:10 ` Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YVQ5F9aT7oSEKenh@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=syzbot+488ddf8087564d6de6e2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox