From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
To: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Use software node API with additional device properties
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 13:05:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YVWL3PyYRanGTlVG@kuha.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3e3e9a3-c430-db98-9e6d-0e3526ddc6f7@linaro.org>
Hi guys,
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:33:27AM +0800, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
> On 2021/9/30 上午1:08, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > [+cc Zhangfei, author of 8304a3a199ee ("PCI: Set dma-can-stall for
> > HiSilicon chips"), which added this]
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 04:37:28PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > > Using device_create_managed_software_node() to inject the
> > > properties in quirk_huawei_pcie_sva() instead of with the
> > > old device_add_properties() API.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
> > This is fine with me, but please update the subject line and commit
> > log something like this:
> >
> > PCI: Convert to device_create_managed_software_node()
> >
> > In quirk_huawei_pcie_sva(), use device_create_managed_software_node()
> > instead of device_add_properties() to set the "dma-can-stall"
> > property.
> >
> > This resolves a software node lifetime issue (see 151f6ff78cdf
> > ("software node: Provide replacement for device_add_properties()"))
> > and paves the way for removing device_add_properties() completely.
> >
> > Actually, 8304a3a199ee was merged during the v5.15 merge window, so if
> > this does in fact fix a lifetime issue, I can merge this before
> > v5.15-final.
It does not fix lifetime issues. This is because device_del() called
device_remove_properties() unconditionally with every device.
There should be no functional impact.
> > I know *this* quirk applies to AMBA devices, and I assume they cannot
> > be removed, so there's no actual lifetime problem in this particular
> > case, but in general it looks like a problem for PCI devices.
> Thanks Bjorn
> This patch also works, though the quirk is for platform devices and not
> removed.
If the device is really never removed, then we could also constify the
node and the properties in it. Then the patch would look like this:
diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
index b6b4c803bdc94..3dc7a1c62bf24 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
@@ -1833,13 +1833,17 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI, 0x1610, PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI
* even when a "PCI" device turns out to be a regular old SoC device
* dressed up as a RCiEP and normal rules don't apply.
*/
+static const struct property_entry huawei_pcie_sva_props[] = {
+ PROPERTY_ENTRY_BOOL("dma-can-stall"),
+ { }
+};
+
+static const struct software_node huawei_pcie_sva_swnode = {
+ .properties = huawei_pcie_sva_props,
+};
+
static void quirk_huawei_pcie_sva(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
- struct property_entry properties[] = {
- PROPERTY_ENTRY_BOOL("dma-can-stall"),
- {},
- };
-
if (pdev->revision != 0x21 && pdev->revision != 0x30)
return;
@@ -1850,7 +1854,7 @@ static void quirk_huawei_pcie_sva(struct pci_dev *pdev)
* can set it directly.
*/
if (!pdev->dev.of_node &&
- device_add_properties(&pdev->dev, properties))
+ device_add_software_node(&pdev->dev, &huawei_pcie_sva_swnode))
pci_warn(pdev, "could not add stall property");
}
DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI, 0xa250, quirk_huawei_pcie_sva);
Let me know if you prefer it that way.
thanks,
--
heikki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-30 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-29 13:37 [PATCH 0/2] device property: Remove device_add_properties() Heikki Krogerus
2021-09-29 13:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Use software node API with additional device properties Heikki Krogerus
2021-09-29 17:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-30 2:33 ` Zhangfei Gao
2021-09-30 10:05 ` Heikki Krogerus [this message]
2021-09-30 10:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-09-30 10:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-30 11:26 ` Heikki Krogerus
2021-09-29 13:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] device property: Remove device_add_properties() API Heikki Krogerus
2021-09-29 15:44 ` [PATCH 0/2] device property: Remove device_add_properties() Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YVWL3PyYRanGTlVG@kuha.fi.intel.com \
--to=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox