From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5FFC433EF for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 12:17:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 704956115B for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 12:17:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235579AbhJSMTi (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2021 08:19:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34218 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235551AbhJSMTg (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2021 08:19:36 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42a.google.com (mail-wr1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE9A3C06161C; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 05:17:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id o20so47482354wro.3; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 05:17:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=88KvQ8MdXceC+8zAxE6BfvdHFdBiDoLz2q1m2brnxJg=; b=ph3KzMorHixjCmz+KxPL+y5l3Nt5LN2mD/D405UejLV5yZHpcyNlRglibRQNFC8MSu Yrgb05GM7byNXhWw0bZI95dz5JovFOFOMI8XKRjBvnHrFWvi0gh3qstYQx+V66JfHxJ5 qg5rPS45jDqsvKk/QbypiiLcUeoM/itB8AoV7Rt7t6mz7q1b2Od5mTn1rrKyGhUVb6wk SlTwrWoM4iZA+jCynT2QS2AC9cm8dvzLkEVn0xUISgFXGgPdpMza7EFAtb6aPON6kOts 6Cc6xfKjm5NQGK0Ape1FMTPhe5wMoFASmcUcYBAt9xRTpATqkbn2q1eVANT+aPXpN2a9 rYPA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=88KvQ8MdXceC+8zAxE6BfvdHFdBiDoLz2q1m2brnxJg=; b=Ht6wItzFoBuMWQaNRzj+Z3VGbbVWa6FI6TyZC6WfQmSIece4BQyAtiVaXRQjZjoQAG vatmEX9nZZdMPyxdKbGsDDm9FgJiep/ZcG/bfq4O03FM4VnOfRtxEVOyVFvp6DER/R+w R2MYIyw1XDVrrA1WOfAhZnyWHO95x4YcA6aa3y8j2xI5o8/HG7Bulp/VkX6izWENq/Ah FZRXx1bmCJoQ7kCqFswQVBRKYsCV9dqnwUsKMmg5m1ixGTQh2qSskrKHNEI2KlzYu787 tW4raoA0L0SxcPLf+Lei9NQhbEv7j42pYX9INuhIIEdunXG7L1viCKBE3j3dSnyrtafM bDig== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530iJ+gX/xvHyWpAGWdheBecv9kx7azd4mQ7Yu/xLiTqjMDSzpzo 1Maon9h+RCP0VGJNVDPdtkY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJygDFMM+4zG93QvACgtlY1sa6gBUvtnwusr9gsXn6Pc98vLG71Nnf5xiPdvsQGapADZPeN8HQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:a3c3:: with SMTP id m3mr43691158wrb.83.1634645842510; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 05:17:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-2-99-153-109.as13285.net. [2.99.153.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c185sm2124671wma.8.2021.10.19.05.17.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 19 Oct 2021 05:17:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 13:17:20 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/68] 5.4.155-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20211018143049.664480980@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211018143049.664480980@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 04:31:04PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.155 release. > There are 68 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 20 Oct 2021 14:30:36 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211012): 65 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211012): 107 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211012): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/285 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip