Re: [PATCH v9] nbd: fix uaf in nbd_handle_reply()

Ming Lei
2021-09-17T03:33:57Z

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 10:18:10PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> There is a problem that nbd_handle_reply() might access freed request:
>
> 1) At first, a normal io is submitted and completed with scheduler:
>
> internel_tag = blk_mq_get_tag -> get tag from sched_tags
> blk_mq_rq_ctx_init
> sched_tags->rq[internel_tag] = sched_tag->static_rq[internel_tag]
> ...
> blk_mq_get_driver_tag
> __blk_mq_get_driver_tag -> get tag from tags
> tags->rq[tag] = sched_tag->static_rq[internel_tag]
>
> So, both tags->rq[tag] and sched_tags->rq[internel_tag] are pointing
> to the request: sched_tags->static_rq[internal_tag]. Even if the
> io is finished.
>
> 2) nbd server send a reply with random tag directly:
>
> recv_work
> nbd_handle_reply
> blk_mq_tag_to_rq(tags, tag)
> rq = tags->rq[tag]
>
> 3) if the sched_tags->static_rq is freed:
>
> blk_mq_sched_free_requests
> blk_mq_free_rqs(q->tag_set, hctx->sched_tags, i)
> -> step 2) access rq before clearing rq mapping
> blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(set, tags, hctx_idx);
> __free_pages() -> rq is freed here
>
> 4) Then, nbd continue to use the freed request in nbd_handle_reply
>
> Fix the problem by get 'q_usage_counter' before blk_mq_tag_to_rq(),
> thus request is ensured not to be freed because 'q_usage_counter' is
> not zero.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> ---
> Changes in v9:
> - move percpu_ref_put() behind.

Looks fine:

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>

--
Ming