public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	edwin.peer@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] devlink: Require devlink lock during device reload
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 09:12:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YX+TUX0agfjMD0Ft@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9716f9a13e217a0a163b745b6e92e02d40973d2c.1635701665.git.leonro@nvidia.com>

On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 07:35:56PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> 
> Devlink reload was implemented as a special command which does _SET_
> operation, but doesn't take devlink->lock, while recursive devlink
> calls that were part of .reload_up()/.reload_down() sequence took it.
> 
> This fragile flow was possible due to holding a big devlink lock
> (devlink_mutex), which effectively stopped all devlink activities,
> even unrelated to reloaded devlink.
> 
> So let's make sure that devlink reload behaves as other commands and
> use special nested locking primitives with a depth of 1. Such change
> opens us to a venue of removing devlink_mutex completely, while keeping
> devlink locking complexity in devlink.c.

Jakub/Dave, I will be mostly unavailable until later this week, but I
have applied this patch to our queue and can report testing results
tomorrow. I would appreciate it if you could hold off on applying it
until then.

Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-01  7:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-31 17:35 [PATCH net-next] devlink: Require devlink lock during device reload Leon Romanovsky
2021-11-01  7:12 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2021-11-01 15:03 ` Jiri Pirko
2021-11-01 20:52   ` Ido Schimmel
2021-11-01 23:11     ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-07 17:16       ` Ido Schimmel
2021-11-07 17:54         ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-11-08 16:09           ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-08 17:32             ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-11-08 18:16               ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-08 18:24                 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-11-08 18:46                   ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-08 19:58                     ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-11-08 23:31                       ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-09 14:12                         ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-11-09 14:17                           ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-09 14:30                             ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-11-09 14:49                               ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-09 16:29                           ` Jiri Pirko
2021-11-09 14:43                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-09 15:07                           ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-09 15:33                             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-09 16:20                               ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-09 18:24                                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-11 12:05                                   ` Jiri Pirko
2021-11-11 12:17                                     ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-11-12  7:38                                       ` Jiri Pirko
2021-11-14  6:19                                         ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-11-15 11:20                                           ` Jiri Pirko
2021-11-15 12:53                                             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 14:42                                               ` Jiri Pirko
2021-11-15 15:09                                                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 15:22                                                   ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-16  7:00                                                     ` Jiri Pirko
2021-11-16 13:45                                                       ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-16  6:57                                                   ` Jiri Pirko
2021-11-16 12:44                                                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-17 14:15                                                       ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-11-10  7:52                                 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-11-09 16:15                             ` Jiri Pirko
2021-11-09 16:26                               ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-11-09 16:30                                 ` Jiri Pirko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YX+TUX0agfjMD0Ft@shredder \
    --to=idosch@idosch.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edwin.peer@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox