From: "andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: YE Chengfeng <cyeaa@connect.ust.hk>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com"
<heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: suspected null-pointer-reference problem for to_swnode
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 19:40:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YXbeF58NlV1o5tcG@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TYCP286MB11888DAE6D94FAE6A9F1CB438A839@TYCP286MB1188.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 02:03:51PM +0000, YE Chengfeng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/base/swnode.c#L405
>
> We notice that the return pointer of to_swnode is null check in some case, while in some case is not. For example, at line 416, the return pointer is null-check, but in line 405 is not. We want to know whether it would be a potential null pointer dereference problem, in the case that null-check is missing.
>
> This problem is detected by our experimental static analysis tool, we are not familiar with the source code and it could just be a false positive. We send this email in case this is a real problem. Would you like to spare some time to have a look at it?
Thank you for the interest to our code!
Line #405 refers to software node operations and it means it won't be ever
called if there is no swnode behind it, means it's backed with properties.
If you think it will be a NULL pointer there, please describe in detail
(with a traceback included) when and how it happens, because such bugs are
serious.
Line #416 refers to the same stage when options are defined and we know we
have been called against swnode. Seems to me like a dead code brought from
day 1 by the commit bc0500c1e43d ("device property: Add fwnode_get_name
for returning the name of a node").
Sakari?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-25 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-25 14:03 suspected null-pointer-reference problem for to_swnode YE Chengfeng
2021-10-25 16:40 ` andriy.shevchenko [this message]
2021-10-26 10:12 ` 回复: " YE Chengfeng
2021-10-26 15:11 ` Sakari Ailus
2021-10-26 16:33 ` andriy.shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YXbeF58NlV1o5tcG@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cyeaa@connect.ust.hk \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox