Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/21] 5.10.79-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 07:45:09PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 1:01 PM Sudip Mukherjee
> <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 07:43:46PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.79 release.
> > > There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Fri, 12 Nov 2021 18:19:54 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > systemd-journal-flush.service failed due to a timeout resulting in a very very
> > slow boot on my test laptop. qemu test on openqa failed due to the same problem.
> 
> Build test:
> mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211104): 63 configs -> no new failure
> arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211104): 105 configs -> no new failure
> arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211104): 3 configs -> no failure
> x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211104): 4 configs -> no failure
> 
> Boot test:
> x86_64: Regression mail sent earlier.  Caused by 8615ff6dd1ac ("mm:
> filemap: check if THP has
> hwpoisoned subpage for PMD page fault").
> 
> arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [1]
> 
> [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/362
> 
> 
> Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

Will go drop the offending patch, thanks.

greg k-h