From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] i2c: designware: Fix the kernel doc description for struct dw_i2c_dev
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 16:18:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZJsUHVhGFsImNvt@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07932f56-ec2d-46a5-7c8e-3f4aab7afd35@infradead.org>
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 08:43:16AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 11/12/21 8:26 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:01 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
> > > On 11/12/21 4:34 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> > > > + * @rinfo: I²C GPIO recovery information
> > >
> > > Preferably: "I2C"
> >
> > Why?
>
> See below vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv:
> > > like it is in thousands of places in the kernel source tree.
When is it good point to start following the spec?
> > UTF-8 has been established for more than a decade. I prefer to use the
> > proper form of the abbreviation (*).
> >
> > *) Check UM10204.pdf.
>
> Yes, I am aware of what is in the spec.
Wolfram, what do you prefer?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-15 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-12 12:34 [PATCH v1 1/1] i2c: designware: Fix the kernel doc description for struct dw_i2c_dev Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-12 13:39 ` Jarkko Nikula
2021-11-12 16:01 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-11-12 16:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-12 16:43 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-11-15 14:18 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2021-11-15 15:26 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-11-15 15:46 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-11-23 19:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-29 9:43 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YZJsUHVhGFsImNvt@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox