Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] kobject: wait until kobject is cleaned up before freeing module

[Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>]

On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 04:07:39PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:45:09AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > kobject_put() may become asynchronously because of
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE, so once kobject_put() returns, the caller may
> > expect the kobject is released after the last refcnt is dropped, however
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE just schedules one delayed work function
> > for cleaning up the kobject.
> 
> The caller should NOT expect the kobject to be released.  That's the
> whole point of dynamic reference counted objects, you never "know" when
> the last object is released.  This option just makes it obvious so that
> you know when to fix up code that has this assumption.

Yes, so CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE needs to be fixed.

> 
> > Inside the cleanup handler, kobj->ktype and kobj->ktype->release are
> > required.
> 
> Yes. Is that a problem?

Of course for CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE, which delays to call
->release after random time, when the module for storing ->ktype and
->ktype->release has been unloaded.

As I mentioned, the issue can be triggered 100% by 'modprobe -r
kset-example' when CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE is enabled if the
1st patch is applied.

> 
> > It is supposed that no activity is on kobject itself any more since
> > module_exit() is started, so it is reasonable for the kobject user or
> > driver to expect that kobject can be really released in the last run of
> > kobject_put() in module_exit() code path. Otherwise, it can be thought as
> > one driver's bug since the module is going away.
> 
> Why is module_exit() somehow special here?  What is so odd about that?

After module_exit() is done, the module will be unloaded, then any code
or data stored in the module can't be referred.

> 
> > When the ->ktype and ->ktype->release are allocated as module static
> > variable, it can cause trouble because the delayed cleanup handler may
> > be run after the module is unloaded.
> 
> Why is ktype and release part of module code?

Lots of driver defines ktype and ktype->release in its module static
variable.

> 
> What module kobject is causing this problem?

Any modules which defines its ktype and ktype->release in its module
static variable, which is pretty common.

> 
> > Fixes the issue by flushing scheduled kobject cleanup work before
> > freeing module.
> 
> Why are modules special here?
> 
> And if you enable this option, and then start unloading kernel modules,
> yes, things can go wrong, but that's not what this kernel option is for
> at all.
> 
> This feels like a hack for not a real problem.

I think it is caused by CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE, that is why this
patch is posted. Otherwise I'd suggest to remove
CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE, which supposes to not panic kernel since
there isn't anything wrong from driver side.


Thanks,
Ming