From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F09C433F5 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2021 15:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242914AbhLDPEI (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Dec 2021 10:04:08 -0500 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:51563 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231150AbhLDPEG (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Dec 2021 10:04:06 -0500 Received: from callcc.thunk.org (96-65-121-81-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [96.65.121.81]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 1B4F0YGA030968 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 4 Dec 2021 10:00:35 -0500 Received: by callcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 158174205DB; Sat, 4 Dec 2021 10:00:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 10:00:34 -0500 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: Joe Perches , LKML , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: co-maintain random.c Message-ID: References: <20211130184315.258150-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> <1c2862682ff04463c7ca1f58f1c46aec4d6af03d.camel@perches.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 11:05:31AM -0500, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Hi Joe, > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 8:01 PM Joe Perches wrote: > > I suggest you reverse the entry order too as Ted really > > hasn't done much to random.c for quite awhile. > > Linus applied this already, but also, I both don't think the order > really matters that much, and I'd really rather this be a "co-" thing, > rather than rocking the boat. Jason, Thanks for stepping up. There's no question that this Fall has been insanely busy for me, and for the past 3 weeks or so, I've been on vacation and Thanksgiving travel, and I'm still catching up on a mountain of e-mail. Something that I think would make sense is that we set up a joint git tree on git.kernel.org, for which we would both have access to push to, and use a group maintainership model much like what other teams have done. Do you agree? - Ted