From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform: finally disallow IRQ0 in platform_get_irq() and its ilk
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 22:06:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbJhu53WEmotslox@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5e001ec1-d3f1-bcb8-7f30-a6301fd9930c@omp.ru>
On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 11:26:47PM +0300, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
> The commit a85a6c86c25b ("driver core: platform: Clarify that IRQ 0 is
> invalid") only calls WARN() when IRQ0 is about to be returned, however
> using IRQ0 is considered invalid (according to Linus) outside the arch/
> code where it's used by the i8253 drivers. Many driver subsystems treat
> 0 specially (e.g. as an indication of the polling mode by libata), so
> the users of platform_get_irq[_byname]() in them would have to filter
> out IRQ0 explicitly and this (quite obviously) doesn't scale...
> Let's finally get this straight and return -EINVAL instead of IRQ0!
You are changing the return value of platform_get_irq_optional().
The problem here is the proposed change doesn't bring any value in such
case. platform_get_irq_optional() should be able (at the end of the day)
to return 3 types of values (as other APIs do):
> 0: success
== 0: IRQ not found
< 0: an error that must be consumed by the caller
0 is unexpected result for non-optional APIs and there you may try to play
tricks (like replacing it by error code).
There was a discussion around the topic:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210331144526.19439-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/T/#u
Wanna help?
> Fixes: a85a6c86c25b ("driver core: platform: Clarify that IRQ 0 is invalid")
Not sure.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-09 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-06 20:26 [PATCH] platform: finally disallow IRQ0 in platform_get_irq() and its ilk Sergey Shtylyov
2021-11-26 16:20 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-12-02 21:11 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-12-09 20:06 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2021-12-09 20:21 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-12-10 11:17 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-01-04 19:27 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-05 10:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-01-09 11:31 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-04 9:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-04 9:47 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-01-04 10:48 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-04 10:53 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-04 11:13 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-05 10:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-01-04 11:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-01-05 9:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-01-04 12:23 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-04 20:30 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-12 17:53 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-12 18:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-12 20:08 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-02-11 20:20 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-01-12 18:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-12 20:20 ` Sergey Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YbJhu53WEmotslox@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=s.shtylyov@omp.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox