From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>
Cc: alim.akhtar@samsung.com, avri.altman@wdc.com,
asutoshd@codeaurora.org, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, stanley.chu@mediatek.com,
beanhuo@micron.com, bvanassche@acm.org, tomas.winkler@intel.com,
cang@codeaurora.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
YongQin Liu <yongqin.liu@linaro.org>,
Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufs: Fix deadlock issue in ufshcd_wait_for_doorbell_clr()
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 10:49:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ybo4no2n+fS4BOaV@ripper> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211214120537.531628-1-huobean@gmail.com>
On Tue 14 Dec 04:05 PST 2021, Bean Huo wrote:
> From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
>
> Call shost_for_each_device() with holding host->host_lock will cause
> a deadlock situation, which will cause the system to stall (the log
> as follow). Fix this issue by using __shost_for_each_device() in
> ufshcd_pending_cmds().
>
> stalls on CPUs/tasks:
> all trace:
> __switch_to+0x120/0x170
> 0xffff800011643998
> ask dump for CPU 5:
> ask:kworker/u16:2 state:R running task stack: 0 pid: 80 ppid: 2 flags:0x0000000a
> orkqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
> all trace:
> __switch_to+0x120/0x170
> 0x0
> ask dump for CPU 6:
> ask:kworker/u16:6 state:R running task stack: 0 pid: 164 ppid: 2 flags:0x0000000a
> orkqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
> all trace:
> __switch_to+0x120/0x170
> 0xffff54e7c4429f80
> ask dump for CPU 7:
> ask:kworker/u16:4 state:R running task stack: 0 pid: 153 ppid: 2 flags:0x0000000a
> orkqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
> all trace:
> __switch_to+0x120/0x170
> blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x34/0x110
> blk_mq_sched_insert_request+0xb0/0x120
> blk_execute_rq_nowait+0x68/0x88
> blk_execute_rq+0x4c/0xd8
> __scsi_execute+0xec/0x1d0
> scsi_vpd_inquiry+0x84/0xf0
> scsi_get_vpd_buf+0x34/0xb8
> scsi_attach_vpd+0x34/0x140
> scsi_probe_and_add_lun+0xa6c/0xab8
> __scsi_scan_target+0x438/0x4f8
> scsi_scan_channel+0x6c/0xa8
> scsi_scan_host_selected+0xf0/0x150
> do_scsi_scan_host+0x88/0x90
> scsi_scan_host+0x1b4/0x1d0
> ufshcd_async_scan+0x248/0x310
> async_run_entry_fn+0x30/0x178
> process_one_work+0x1e8/0x368
> worker_thread+0x40/0x478
> kthread+0x174/0x180
> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
>
> Fixes: 8d077ede48c1 ("scsi: ufs: Optimize the command queueing code")
> Reported-by: YongQin Liu <yongqin.liu@linaro.org>
> Reported-by: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org>
> Tested-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Regards,
Bjorn
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index 6dd517267f1b..fbebb8309ef7 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -1082,7 +1082,8 @@ static u32 ufshcd_pending_cmds(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> struct scsi_device *sdev;
> u32 pending = 0;
>
> - shost_for_each_device(sdev, hba->host)
> + lockdep_assert_held(hba->host->host_lock);
> + __shost_for_each_device(sdev, hba->host)
> pending += sbitmap_weight(&sdev->budget_map);
>
> return pending;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-15 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-14 12:05 [PATCH v2] scsi: ufs: Fix deadlock issue in ufshcd_wait_for_doorbell_clr() Bean Huo
2021-12-15 18:49 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2021-12-17 3:51 ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-12-23 5:09 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ybo4no2n+fS4BOaV@ripper \
--to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=amit.pundir@linaro.org \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=huobean@gmail.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
--cc=yongqin.liu@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox