From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: David Collins <quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <quic_subbaram@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: define support for name based regulators
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 13:51:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbpHPU7PsGO2i+uw@robh.at.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2d78b0f19991f8028d9be913be0a5aefd7d1ee17.1639099631.git.quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>
On Thu, 09 Dec 2021 17:54:41 -0800, David Collins wrote:
> Allow SCMI regulator subnodes to be specified either by ID using
> the "reg" property or by name using the "regulator-name" property.
>
> Name based SCMI regulator specification helps ensure that an SCMI
> agent doesn't need to be aware of the numbering scheme used for
> Voltage Domains by the SCMI platform. It also ensures that the
> correct Voltage Domain is selected for a given physical regulator.
> This cannot be guaranteed with numeric Voltage Domain IDs alone.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Collins <quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-15 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-10 1:54 [PATCH 0/2] regulator: scmi: add support for registering SCMI regulators by name David Collins
2021-12-10 1:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: define support for name based regulators David Collins
2021-12-15 19:51 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2022-01-24 23:20 ` [RESEND PATCH " David Collins
2021-12-10 1:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] regulator: scmi: add support for registering SCMI regulators by name David Collins
2022-01-24 23:20 ` [RESEND PATCH " David Collins
2022-01-24 23:20 ` [RESEND PATCH 0/2] " David Collins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YbpHPU7PsGO2i+uw@robh.at.kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_collinsd@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_subbaram@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox