From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: William Roche <william.roche@oracle.com>,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mchehab@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, james.morse@arm.com,
rric@kernel.org, Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] EDAC/amd64: Add new register offset support and related changes
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 15:46:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbtfcUmWAFDWMG9w@yaz-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ybou1VTJ8oced4Ge@zn.tnic>
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 07:07:17PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 05:32:27PM +0100, William Roche wrote:
> > > @@ -2174,8 +2215,13 @@ static int f17_addr_mask_to_cs_size(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 umc,
> > > * There is one mask per DIMM, and two Chip Selects per DIMM.
> > > * CS0 and CS1 -> DIMM0
> > > * CS2 and CS3 -> DIMM1
> > > + *
> > > + * Systems with newer register layout have one mask per Chip Select.
> >
> > Just a question about this comment: Can it be translated into this ?
> >
> > + * Except on systems with newer register layout where we have one Chip Select per DIMM.
>
> Sure, but without the "we":
>
> ...
> * On systems with the newer register layout there is one Chip Select per DIMM.
> */
>
Hi William,
Thanks for the suggestion, but it's not quite correct.
There are still two Chip Selects per DIMM module, i.e. the system can support
dual-rank (2R) DIMMs. Current AMD systems can support upto 2 DIMMs per Unified
Memory Controller (UMC). There are two "Address Mask" registers in each UMC,
and each register covers an entire DIMM (and by extension the two Chip Selects
available for each DIMM).
Future systems will still support upto 2 DIMMs per UMC. However, the register
space is updated so that there are now four "Address Mask" registers per UMC.
And each of these registers is now explicitly related to one of the four Chip
Selects available per UMC.
Does this help? I can update the code comments with these details.
Thanks,
Yazen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-16 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-15 15:53 [PATCH v2 0/2] AMD Family 19h Models 10h-1Fh Updates Yazen Ghannam
2021-12-15 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] EDAC/amd64: Check register values from all UMCs Yazen Ghannam
2021-12-15 18:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-16 16:08 ` Yazen Ghannam
2021-12-30 11:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-01-05 16:12 ` Yazen Ghannam
2021-12-15 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] EDAC/amd64: Add new register offset support and related changes Yazen Ghannam
2021-12-15 16:32 ` William Roche
2021-12-15 18:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-16 15:46 ` Yazen Ghannam [this message]
2021-12-16 18:43 ` William Roche
2021-12-16 19:21 ` Yazen Ghannam
2021-12-15 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] AMD Family 19h Models 10h-1Fh Updates Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YbtfcUmWAFDWMG9w@yaz-ubuntu \
--to=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
--cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=rric@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=william.roche@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).