public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mchehab@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	rric@kernel.org, Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com,
	william.roche@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] EDAC/amd64: Check register values from all UMCs
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 16:08:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YbtkcppejpW8gHqY@yaz-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YbotciKVDsH1Fl1H@zn.tnic>

On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 07:01:22PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 03:53:08PM +0000, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> > -		if ((pvt->umc[0].dimm_cfg | pvt->umc[1].dimm_cfg) & BIT(5))
> > +		u32 umc_cfg = 0, dimm_cfg = 0, i = 0;
> > +
> > +		for_each_umc(i) {
> > +			umc_cfg  |= pvt->umc[i].umc_cfg;
> > +			dimm_cfg |= pvt->umc[i].dimm_cfg;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		if (dimm_cfg & BIT(5))
> >  			pvt->dram_type = MEM_LRDDR4;
> > -		else if ((pvt->umc[0].dimm_cfg | pvt->umc[1].dimm_cfg) & BIT(4))
> > +		else if (dimm_cfg & BIT(4))
> 
> You're working here under the assumption that bit 4 and 5 will have the
> same value on all those UMCs.
> 
> You're probably going to say that that is how the BIOS is programming
> them so they should be all the same and any other configuration is
> invalid but lemme still ask about it explicitly.
> 
> And if so, this would probably need a comment above it which I can add
> when applying...
> 
> Hmm?
>

No, that's a good question. And actually the assumption is incorrect. It is
allowed to have different DIMM types in a system though all DIMMs on a single
UMC must match.

Do you recommend a follow up patch or should this one be reworked?

Thanks,
Yazen

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-16 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-15 15:53 [PATCH v2 0/2] AMD Family 19h Models 10h-1Fh Updates Yazen Ghannam
2021-12-15 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] EDAC/amd64: Check register values from all UMCs Yazen Ghannam
2021-12-15 18:01   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-16 16:08     ` Yazen Ghannam [this message]
2021-12-30 11:36       ` Borislav Petkov
2022-01-05 16:12         ` Yazen Ghannam
2021-12-15 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] EDAC/amd64: Add new register offset support and related changes Yazen Ghannam
2021-12-15 16:32   ` William Roche
2021-12-15 18:07     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-16 15:46       ` Yazen Ghannam
2021-12-16 18:43         ` William Roche
2021-12-16 19:21           ` Yazen Ghannam
2021-12-15 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] AMD Family 19h Models 10h-1Fh Updates Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YbtkcppejpW8gHqY@yaz-ubuntu \
    --to=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
    --cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=rric@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=william.roche@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox