public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	gwendal@google.com, seanpaul@google.com, marcheau@google.com,
	rajatxjain@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/privacy_screen_x86: Add entry for ChromeOS privacy-screen
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 11:50:25 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YcDegV8wqljpU3J0@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211217202850.1967594-2-rajatja@google.com>

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:28:50PM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
> Add a static entry in the x86 table, to detect and wait for
> privacy-screen on some ChromeOS platforms.
> 
> Please note that this means that if CONFIG_CHROMEOS_PRIVACY_SCREEN is
> enabled, and if "GOOG0010" device is found in ACPI, then the i915 probe
> shall return EPROBE_DEFER until a platform driver actually registers the
> privacy-screen: https://hansdegoede.livejournal.com/25948.html
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>
> ---
> v2: * Use #if instead of #elif
>     * Reorder the patches in the series.
>     * Rebased on drm-tip
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_privacy_screen_x86.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_privacy_screen_x86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_privacy_screen_x86.c
> index a2cafb294ca6..0c5699ad70a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_privacy_screen_x86.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_privacy_screen_x86.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,18 @@ static bool __init detect_thinkpad_privacy_screen(void)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CHROMEOS_PRIVACY_SCREEN)
> +static bool __init detect_chromeos_privacy_screen(void)

Does marking this __init work in case there is a deferral? Can it happen
that privacy screen is a module and so will get loaded only after we
discarded __init sections.

> +{
> +	if (!acpi_dev_present("GOOG0010", NULL, -1))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	pr_info("%s: Need to wait for ChromeOS privacy-screen drvr", __func__);

I still do not see how this message is helpful. If it is really desired,
I'd put something into the code that calls into lookups.

> +	return true;
> +
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  static const struct arch_init_data arch_init_data[] __initconst = {
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_THINKPAD_ACPI)
>  	{
> @@ -58,6 +70,16 @@ static const struct arch_init_data arch_init_data[] __initconst = {
>  		.detect = detect_thinkpad_privacy_screen,
>  	},
>  #endif
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CHROMEOS_PRIVACY_SCREEN)
> +	{
> +		.lookup = {
> +			.dev_id = NULL,
> +			.con_id = NULL,
> +			.provider = "privacy_screen-GOOG0010:00",
> +		},
> +		.detect = detect_chromeos_privacy_screen,
> +	},
> +#endif
>  };
>  
>  void __init drm_privacy_screen_lookup_init(void)
> -- 
> 2.34.1.307.g9b7440fafd-goog
> 

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-20 19:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-17 20:28 [PATCH v2 1/2] platform/chrome: Add driver for ChromeOS privacy-screen Rajat Jain
2021-12-17 20:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/privacy_screen_x86: Add entry " Rajat Jain
2021-12-20 19:50   ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2021-12-20 20:29     ` Rajat Jain
2021-12-20 22:00       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2021-12-20 19:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] platform/chrome: Add driver " Dmitry Torokhov
2021-12-20 20:21   ` Rajat Jain
2021-12-20 22:07     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2021-12-20 23:31       ` Rajat Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YcDegV8wqljpU3J0@google.com \
    --to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=bleung@chromium.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gwendal@google.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=marcheau@google.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=rajatja@google.com \
    --cc=rajatxjain@gmail.com \
    --cc=seanpaul@google.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox