From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: "Srinivas Kandagatla" <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
"Johan Hovold" <johan@kernel.org>,
"Andrey Smirnov" <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmem: fix unregistering device in nvmem_register() error path
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 17:06:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YcH7fw5S6aSXswvb@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211221154550.11455-1-zajec5@gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 04:45:50PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>
> 1. Drop incorrect put_device() calls
>
> If device_register() fails then underlaying device_add() takes care of
> calling put_device() if needed. There is no need to do that in a driver.
Did you read the documentation for device_register() that says:
* NOTE: _Never_ directly free @dev after calling this function, even
* if it returned an error! Always use put_device() to give up the
* reference initialized in this function instead.
> 2. Use device_unregister()
>
> Now that we don't call put_device() we can use above helper.
>
> Fixes: 3360acdf8391 ("nvmem: core: fix leaks on registration errors")
> Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> ---
> That put_device() was explicitly added by Johan but after checking
> device_register() twice I still think it's incorrect. I hope I didn't
> miss sth obvious and I didn't mess it up.
> ---
> drivers/nvmem/core.c | 10 ++++------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> index 785a56e33f69..f7f31af7226f 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> @@ -901,12 +901,12 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *config)
>
> rval = device_register(&nvmem->dev);
> if (rval)
> - goto err_put_device;
> + return ERR_PTR(rval);
Where do you call put_device() to free the allocated memory?
You just leaked the kzalloc() call to allocate the memory pointed to by
nvmem :(
I think the code is fine as-is.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-21 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-21 15:45 [PATCH] nvmem: fix unregistering device in nvmem_register() error path Rafał Miłecki
2021-12-21 16:06 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2021-12-21 17:46 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-12-22 7:44 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-12-22 8:38 ` Johan Hovold
2021-12-22 8:56 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-12-22 9:02 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-12-22 9:03 ` Johan Hovold
2021-12-22 9:24 ` Johan Hovold
2021-12-22 9:34 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-12-22 9:00 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-12-22 9:08 ` Johan Hovold
2021-12-22 9:16 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-12-22 9:26 ` Johan Hovold
2021-12-22 9:46 ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-12-22 9:30 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-12-22 9:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YcH7fw5S6aSXswvb@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=andrew.smirnov@gmail.com \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox