From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>,
mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com,
gustavoars@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next, v2] sched: Use struct_size() helper in task_numa_group()
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 10:18:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yd/ugQ8kUmcceuex@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220111101425.7c59de5b@rorschach.local.home>
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 10:14:25AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:30:42 +0100
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > > > > if (unlikely(!deref_curr_numa_group(p))) {
> > > > > - unsigned int size = sizeof(struct numa_group) +
> > > > > - NR_NUMA_HINT_FAULT_STATS *
> > > > > - nr_node_ids * sizeof(unsigned long);
> > > > > + unsigned int size = struct_size(grp, faults,
> > > > > + NR_NUMA_HINT_FAULT_STATS * nr_node_ids);
> > > >
> > > > Again, why?! The old code was perfectly readable, this, not so much.
> > >
> > > Because it is unsafe,
> >
> > Unsafe how? Changelog doesn't mention anything, nor do you. In fact,
> > Changelog says there is no functional change, which makes me hate the
> > thing for obscuring something that was simple.
>
> If for some reason faults changes in size, the original code must be
> updated whereas the new code is robust enough to not need changing.
Then I would still much prefer something like:
unsigned int size = sizeof(*grp) +
NR_NUMA_HINT_FAULT_STATS * numa_node_ids * sizeof(gfp->faults);
Which is still far more readable than some obscure macro. But again, the
Changelog doesn't mention any actual benefit of the patch and makes the
code less clear.
> It's a C hack and far from trivial. Maybe to you as you are use to
> these hacks. But seriously, this is not something the average C coder
> is use to, as variable length structures are rather unique to the
> kernel.
That's just not true, I've used them in userspace too (even before I
started tinkering with the kernel). I've even used this pattern in other
languages.
It is a fairly useful and common pattern to have a small structure and
an array in the same memory allocation.
Think hash-tables, the structure contains the size of the table and some
other things, like for example a seed for the hash function or a lock,
and then the table itself as an array.
I can't, nor do I want to, remember all these stupid little macros. Esp.
not for trivial things like this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-13 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-10 1:23 [PATCH -next, v2] sched: Use struct_size() helper in task_numa_group() Xiu Jianfeng
2022-01-10 15:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-10 22:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-11 0:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-11 6:17 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2022-01-11 11:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-11 15:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-13 9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-01-15 3:50 ` Kees Cook
2022-01-18 1:36 ` xiujianfeng
2022-01-18 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-19 19:01 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yd/ugQ8kUmcceuex@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=xiujianfeng@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox