public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Dan Li <ashimida@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	samitolvanen@google.com, maz@kernel.org, joey.gouly@arm.com,
	pcc@google.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] aarch64: scs: reload shadow call stack in user exception entry
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 10:40:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YdQkM8IlonhEhU/R@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211228010604.109572-1-ashimida@linux.alibaba.com>

Hi,

On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 05:06:04PM -0800, Dan Li wrote:
> When el0 exception occurs, kernel_entry/exit will load/save tsk->scs_sp
> to ensure scs working properly. AFAIK, the SCS offset should always be
> 0 at this time.
> 
> Is it reasonable to reload x18 to scs_base directly in kernel_entry
> here, or am I missing something?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Li <ashimida@linux.alibaba.com>

AFAICT the saving here is just that we avoid storing the SCS SP upon return to
EL0, and I suspect that in practice that's not measureable.

So without numbers to show otherwise, I'd prefer to leave this as-is, though I
agree that this patch should work.  If we do want to change this, I think we
need a comment in the `kernel_exit` path to pair with the `scs_load` in
`kernel_entry`.

Thanks,
Mark.

> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/scs.h | 7 +++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S    | 3 +--
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/scs.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/scs.h
> index 8297bccf0784..2bc0d0575e75 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/scs.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/scs.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,10 @@
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK
>  	scs_sp	.req	x18
>  
> +	.macro scs_reload tsk
> +	ldr	scs_sp, [\tsk, #TSK_TI_SCS_BASE]
> +	.endm
> +
>  	.macro scs_load tsk
>  	ldr	scs_sp, [\tsk, #TSK_TI_SCS_SP]
>  	.endm
> @@ -17,6 +21,9 @@
>  	str	scs_sp, [\tsk, #TSK_TI_SCS_SP]
>  	.endm
>  #else
> +	.macro scs_reload tsk
> +	.endm
> +
>  	.macro scs_load tsk
>  	.endm
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> index bc6d5a970a13..57547a3e4f7c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ alternative_if ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH
>  alternative_else_nop_endif
>  1:
>  
> -	scs_load tsk
> +	scs_reload tsk
>  	.else
>  	add	x21, sp, #PT_REGS_SIZE
>  	get_current_task tsk
> @@ -365,7 +365,6 @@ alternative_if ARM64_WORKAROUND_845719
>  alternative_else_nop_endif
>  #endif
>  3:
> -	scs_save tsk
>  
>  	/* Ignore asynchronous tag check faults in the uaccess routines */
>  	ldr	x0, [tsk, THREAD_SCTLR_USER]
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-04 10:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-28  1:06 [PATCH] [RFC] aarch64: scs: reload shadow call stack in user exception entry Dan Li
2022-01-04 10:40 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2022-01-04 14:32   ` Dan Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YdQkM8IlonhEhU/R@FVFF77S0Q05N \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=ashimida@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pcc@google.com \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox