From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<x86@kernel.org>, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: x86: don't touch irr_pending in kvm_apic_update_apicv when inhibiting it
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 22:57:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YdTQ3ewNzNOKoXCN@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211213104634.199141-5-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> kvm_apic_update_apicv is called when AVIC is still active, thus IRR bits
> can be set by the CPU after it was called, and won't cause the irr_pending
> to be set to true.
>
> Also the logic in avic_kick_target_vcpu doesn't expect a race with this
> function.
>
> To make it simple, just keep irr_pending set to true and
> let the next interrupt injection to the guest clear it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index baca9fa37a91c..6e1fbbf4c508b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -2312,7 +2312,10 @@ void kvm_apic_update_apicv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> apic->irr_pending = true;
> apic->isr_count = 1;
> } else {
> - apic->irr_pending = (apic_search_irr(apic) != -1);
> + /*
> + * Don't touch irr_pending, let it be cleared when
> + * we process the interrupt
Please don't use pronouns in comments, e.g. who is "we" in this context? Please
also say _why_. IIUC, this could more precisely be:
/*
* Don't clear irr_pending, searching the IRR can race with
* updates from the CPU as APICv is still active from hardware's
* perspective. The flag will be cleared as appropriate when
* KVM injects the interrupt.
*/
> + */
> apic->isr_count = count_vectors(apic->regs + APIC_ISR);
> }
> }
> --
> 2.26.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-04 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-13 10:46 [PATCH v2 0/5] RFC: KVM: SVM: Allow L1's AVIC to co-exist with nesting Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: nSVM: deal with L1 hypervisor that intercepts interrupts but lets L2 control EFLAGS.IF Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 11:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-13 13:07 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 13:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-13 13:29 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: SVM: allow to force AVIC to be enabled Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-04 22:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-05 10:54 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-05 17:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: SVM: fix race between interrupt delivery and AVIC inhibition Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-04 22:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-05 11:03 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-05 11:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-05 12:15 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-07 15:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-07 23:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-10 15:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: x86: don't touch irr_pending in kvm_apic_update_apicv when inhibiting it Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-04 22:57 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-01-05 10:56 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: SVM: allow AVIC to co-exist with a nested guest running Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-05 21:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-06 8:44 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-06 17:41 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YdTQ3ewNzNOKoXCN@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).