From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: "Mateusz Jończyk" <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] rtc-cmos,rtc-mc146818-lib: fixes
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 14:03:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ydg6EnPdWjB3Vznc@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220107124934.159878-1-mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>
Hi,
On 07/01/2022 13:49:25+0100, Mateusz Jończyk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch series fixes some issues in the RTC CMOS handling code:
>
> 1. A missing spin_lock_irq() / spin_unlock_irq() pair in cmos_set_alarm().
> 2. A failing presence check of the RTC: the clock was misdetected as
> broken since Linux 5.11 on one of our home systems.
> 3. Do not touch the RTC alarm registers when the RTC update is in
> progress. (On some Intel chipsets, this causes bogus values being
> read or writes to fail silently.)
>
> This is my first patch series, so please review carefully.
>
> v2: Drop the last patch:
> Revert "rtc: cmos: Replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock in hard IRQ"
> which was made obsolete by mainlining of
> commit 13be2efc390a ("rtc: cmos: Disable irq around direct invocation of cmos_interrupt()")
>
> v3: Rework solution to problem 3 (I'd like to thank Greg KH for comment),
> drop x86 refactoring patches (I'll send them later).
>
> v4: Fixed some issues pointed out by Mr Alexandre Belloni:
> - do not add strings to rtc-mc146818-lib.c - I moved the error printing
> code to callers of mc146818_get_time(). This resulted in two new
> patches in the series,
> - other small issues.
>
> v5: Increase maximum accepted duration of the UIP high pulse from 10 to 20ms,
> in case there are some very slow chips out there.
>
> Note: this may cause problems with hpet_rtc_interrupt() if the CMOS
> RTC stops working while the system is running and RTC update
> interrupt / RTC alarm interrupt is enabled (which should be rare).
> In this case, hpet_rtc_interrupt() is executed 64 times per second
> and takes up to 20ms to complete - which may constantly occupy
> one CPU. I am not sure if this is likely enough to implement
> special handling of this case in hpet_rtc_interrupt().
>
Because v4 has been applied, you'd have to send a series against
rtc-next.
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-07 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-07 12:49 [PATCH v5 0/9] rtc-cmos,rtc-mc146818-lib: fixes Mateusz Jończyk
2022-01-07 12:49 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] rtc-cmos: take rtc_lock while reading from CMOS Mateusz Jończyk
2022-01-07 12:49 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] rtc: change return values of mc146818_get_time() Mateusz Jończyk
2022-01-07 12:49 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] Check return value from mc146818_get_time() Mateusz Jończyk
2022-01-07 12:49 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] rtc-mc146818-lib: fix RTC presence check Mateusz Jończyk
2022-01-07 12:49 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] rtc-mc146818-lib: extract mc146818_avoid_UIP Mateusz Jończyk
2022-01-07 12:49 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] rtc-mc146818-lib: refactor mc146818_get_time Mateusz Jończyk
2022-01-07 12:49 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] rtc-mc146818-lib: refactor mc146818_does_rtc_work Mateusz Jończyk
2022-01-07 12:49 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] rtc-cmos: avoid UIP when reading alarm time Mateusz Jończyk
2022-01-07 12:51 ` [DEBUG PATCH v5] rtc-cmos: cmos_read_alarm bug demonstration Mateusz Jończyk
2022-03-29 20:02 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] rtc-cmos: avoid UIP when reading alarm time Mateusz Jończyk
2022-01-07 12:49 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] rtc-cmos: avoid UIP when writing " Mateusz Jończyk
2022-01-07 13:03 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2022-01-07 13:14 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] rtc-cmos,rtc-mc146818-lib: fixes Mateusz Jończyk
2022-01-07 15:34 ` [PATCH] RFC: rtc-mc146818-lib: wait longer for UIP to clear Mateusz Jończyk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ydg6EnPdWjB3Vznc@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mat.jonczyk@o2.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox