From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD7AC433F5
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:12:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S243969AbiANTMa (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 14 Jan 2022 14:12:30 -0500
Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:47616 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S239598AbiANTMa (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 14 Jan 2022 14:12:30 -0500
Received: from zn.tnic (dslb-088-067-202-008.088.067.pools.vodafone-ip.de [88.67.202.8])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id BCE021EC057F;
        Fri, 14 Jan 2022 20:12:24 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim;
        t=1642187544;
        h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
         to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
         content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:  references:references;
        bh=EzMHEAxaof37SzJL7sWDINYpwOQF97FdHDsxCuYyLlA=;
        b=DcUM2bi22w5V4BLHJts834Ta+0k+/+IlbbHs6iTSroPrPT0GbcxyE0chrrFIBCJZLK2KxO
        gHQd4HhYD7Il9Ay9vUvxn/vRdKp5IExIXW84wgS82PxEqHAhtyMZXfJETllgbjYmZWN9s0
        +rStI2uOhe26T1OQ9l+r8ClI4n8EybI=
Date:   Fri, 14 Jan 2022 20:12:32 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Remove a.out support
Message-ID: <YeHLIDsjGB944GSP@zn.tnic>
References: <20220113160115.5375-1-bp@alien8.de>
 <YeBzxuO0wLn/B2Ew@mit.edu>
 <YeCuNapJLK4M5sat@zn.tnic>
 <CAMuHMdUbTNNr16YY1TFe=-uRLjg6yGzgw_RqtAFpyhnOMM5Pvw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdUbTNNr16YY1TFe=-uRLjg6yGzgw_RqtAFpyhnOMM5Pvw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 03:52:29PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Quoting myself (do I need a canned response for this? ;-):
>    "I think it's safe to assume no one still runs a.out binaries on m68k."

I remember now that I've looked at the thread from back then but what
are you trying to say with your quote?

Do you wanna see another patch which rips out a.out support from m68k?

I could do one ontop but besides build-testing I can't test any other
way on m68k...

:-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette