From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A17CC4332F for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 16:31:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1356154AbiASQbz (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:31:55 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45312 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1349278AbiASQbx (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:31:53 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x330.google.com (mail-wm1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::330]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 195B0C061574 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 08:31:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x330.google.com with SMTP id n8so6140066wmk.3 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 08:31:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=JHPXrS2qN/gp4DPge+yQw/YJAFIsbcJAD04stx8TMDs=; b=duEaok0g/cyzPt5DW/HxLShjizs52YJm2C4Q4iDkbmzB8h1PxYgV6wHdI+2KA6SxWQ TEiMhtAZxmTKUJ+BatE/p38O0+59EWYhDQVdBuHi2mtSLrzkHWonA/lNiipQ7dlskxhd e7UlyY8dHWgUTf2iM8+Zc7by/KEWzDKid8qFg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to; bh=JHPXrS2qN/gp4DPge+yQw/YJAFIsbcJAD04stx8TMDs=; b=bIN+jv6iYcbICp28BAyrYW7rqVD8F7EdqC8GJEMRPk2cVGI8Cf3sA4jKiXGzV005Dt KYpsW42vtfkl7N9qjofTunJ4fos94Zq6MgHmJw+ps/bweV8frAfcLR90Uy22VPdXhJll JMF5PC2xu8AYzO/wHwfpqEhvf/zPybSmZWDfigaRmMANjPpBkFQ4g5D9uHfw1r9hXU9K 4fSoq55SDETnvsAMNWcvx4cH2ZzN0TZwZVuC7csPIHGARxcSvWkAUw7Gl0qOVTmoJHQ4 9YNFqDy7lkmb2bHcyI0xrj6hNUYgNJCR6A3XwOieYUzYDCPyhz2EfHYYRQNAT0FupXPS PGFw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Y004qnUvna25Urq1AudQWOlloaUI0U6sh84rWIpL3NdnKf2j1 HYCQY6LDOLwqJMrD5s6Qok0rzA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxVXF24cz+9MngO0pmY2tmMrC8kRICutqpk0t8GupJtxIbwSe4uni7zW2JT6qBcKAQx7C4Zzw== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c0d3:: with SMTP id s19mr4333862wmh.66.1642609911708; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 08:31:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from phenom.ffwll.local ([2a02:168:57f4:0:efd0:b9e5:5ae6:c2fa]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p4sm5625581wmq.40.2022.01.19.08.31.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 19 Jan 2022 08:31:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 17:31:49 +0100 From: Daniel Vetter To: Jani Nikula Cc: Helge Deller , Daniel Vetter , Sven Schnelle , Linux Fbdev development list , Thomas Zimmermann , Daniel Vetter , Linus Torvalds , Javier Martinez Canillas , DRI Development , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Tomi Valkeinen , Claudio Suarez , Gerd Hoffmann , Pavel Machek , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Geert Uytterhoeven , Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "fbcon: Disable accelerated scrolling" Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Jani Nikula , Helge Deller , Sven Schnelle , Linux Fbdev development list , Thomas Zimmermann , Daniel Vetter , Linus Torvalds , Javier Martinez Canillas , DRI Development , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Tomi Valkeinen , Claudio Suarez , Gerd Hoffmann , Pavel Machek , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Geert Uytterhoeven , Sam Ravnborg References: <4d8950c7-5f51-ca2b-4c93-741c7805a214@gmx.de> <8735ljkboo.fsf@x1.stackframe.org> <40d39363-bae8-93f2-71c6-7d5531f144bf@gmx.de> <87ilufbt58.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ilufbt58.fsf@intel.com> X-Operating-System: Linux phenom 5.10.0-8-amd64 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 06:13:39PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jan 2022, Helge Deller wrote: > > On 1/19/22 16:42, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> If otoh you get the maintainership first to be able to cram in reverts > >> without discussions, then it's very backwards. > > I'm working on the Linux kernel since at least 23 years and am a maintainer of parts of it. > > I know that and would never push something which is controversal without discussions. > > I think the entire MAINTAINERS change was controversial and rushed to > Linus without discussion over a weekend. Yeah just looking at the size of the thread is pretty clear indiciation that this went wrong real good. And I said that you need to clean this up in my very first reply. None of this should have been a surprise, but somehow it all happened. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch