From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
hdegoede@redhat.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com, mgross@linux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
Mark Gross <markgross@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] platform/x86: Add Intel Software Defined Silicon driver
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 14:43:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yf0taBe4PwTNbu9g@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <372f76f7b1b7cf3d0ca38a7a84bcc23322ff12ed.camel@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 05:23:07AM -0800, David E. Box wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 02:14 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 21:30 -0800, David E. Box wrote:
> > > Intel Software Defined Silicon (SDSi) is a post manufacturing mechanism for
> > > activating additional silicon features. Features are enabled through a
> > > license activation process.
> >
> > Why isn't this a user process and not a kernel one?
>
> This is a mechanism for provisioning CPU features during runtime. It requires a
> driver to access the functionality. That functionality is discovered on a multi
> functional PCI device that is owned by the upstream intel_vsec driver.
>
> >
> > > V5
> > > - Update kernel version to 5.18 in API doc and copyrights to 2022.
> > > - Remove unneeded prototypes.
> > > - In binary attribute handlers where ret is only used for errors,
> > > replace,
> > > return (ret < 0) ? ret : size;
> > > with,
> > > return ret ?: size;
> >
> > I think this style overly tricky.
> >
> > Why not the canonical:
> >
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> >
> > return size;
>
> I can see not using the 2 parameter shortcut of the ternary operator, but the
> regular 3 parameter expression is easy to read for simple operations.
Not always. Spell it out please and be obvious.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-04 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-04 5:30 [PATCH V5 0/3] Intel Software Defined Silicon David E. Box
2022-02-04 5:30 ` [PATCH V5 1/3] platform/x86: Add Intel Software Defined Silicon driver David E. Box
2022-02-04 6:57 ` Greg KH
2022-02-04 10:14 ` Joe Perches
2022-02-04 13:23 ` David E. Box
2022-02-04 13:43 ` Greg KH [this message]
2022-02-04 14:01 ` Joe Perches
2022-02-04 17:01 ` David E. Box
2022-02-04 5:30 ` [PATCH V5 2/3] tools arch x86: Add Intel SDSi provisiong tool David E. Box
2022-02-04 5:30 ` [PATCH V5 3/3] selftests: sdsi: test sysfs setup David E. Box
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yf0taBe4PwTNbu9g@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markgross@kernel.org \
--cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox