public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ardb@kernel.org,
	bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, frederic@kernel.org,
	james.morse@arm.com, joey.gouly@arm.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	valentin.schneider@arm.com, will@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] arm64: support PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 18:48:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yf107Tg2cW0wR22+@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220204150557.434610-8-mark.rutland@arm.com>

On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 03:05:57PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> This patch enables support for PREEMPT_DYNAMIC on arm64, allowing the
> preemption model to be chosen at boot time.
> 
> Specifically, this patch selects HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_KEY, so that each
> preemption function is an out-of-line call with an early return
> depending upon a static key. This leaves almost all the codegen up to
> the compiler, and side-steps a number of pain points with static calls
> (e.g. interaction with CFI schemes). This should have no worse overhead
> than using non-inline static calls, as those use out-of-line trampolines
> with early returns.
> 
> For example, the dynamic_cond_resched() wrapper looks as follows (with
> the first `B` being replaced with a `NOP` when the function is
> disabled):
> 
> | <dynamic_cond_resched>:
> |        bti     c
> |        b       <dynamic_cond_resched+0x10>
> |        mov     w0, #0x0                        // #0
> |        ret
> |        mrs     x0, sp_el0
> |        ldr     x0, [x0, #8]
> |        cbnz    x0, <dynamic_cond_resched+0x8>
> |        paciasp
> |        stp     x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
> |        mov     x29, sp
> |        bl      <preempt_schedule_common>
> |        mov     w0, #0x1                        // #1
> |        ldp     x29, x30, [sp], #16
> |        autiasp
> |        ret
> 
> ... compared to the regular form of the function:
> 
> | <__cond_resched>:
> |        bti     c
> |        mrs     x0, sp_el0
> |        ldr     x1, [x0, #8]
> |        cbz     x1, <__cond_resched+0x18>
> |        mov     w0, #0x0                        // #0
> |        ret
> |        paciasp
> |        stp     x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
> |        mov     x29, sp
> |        bl      <preempt_schedule_common>
> |        mov     w0, #0x1                        // #1
> |        ldp     x29, x30, [sp], #16
> |        autiasp
> |        ret
> 
> Since arm64 does not yet use the generic entry code, we must define our
> own `sk_dynamic_irqentry_exit_cond_resched`, which will be
> enabled/disabled by the common code in kernel/sched/core.c. All other
> preemption functions and associated static keys are defined there.
> 
> Note that PREEMPT_DYNAMIC is `def bool y`, so this will default to
> enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

      reply	other threads:[~2022-02-04 18:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-04 15:05 [PATCH v2 0/7] arm64 / sched/preempt: support PREEMPT_DYNAMIC with static keys Mark Rutland
2022-02-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] sched/preempt: move PREEMPT_DYNAMIC logic later Mark Rutland
2022-02-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] sched/preempt: refactor sched_dynamic_update() Mark Rutland
2022-02-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] sched/preempt: simplify irqentry_exit_cond_resched() callers Mark Rutland
2022-02-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] sched/preempt: decouple HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC from GENERIC_ENTRY Mark Rutland
2022-02-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] sched/preempt: add PREEMPT_DYNAMIC using static keys Mark Rutland
2022-02-07 11:57   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-02-08 12:15     ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] arm64: entry: centralize premeption decision Mark Rutland
2022-02-04 18:46   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-02-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] arm64: support PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mark Rutland
2022-02-04 18:48   ` Catalin Marinas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yf107Tg2cW0wR22+@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox