From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0CCAC433F5 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 14:32:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1380153AbiBEOcQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Feb 2022 09:32:16 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40458 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230484AbiBEOcO (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Feb 2022 09:32:14 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com (mail-wm1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D1E1C061346; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 06:32:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id bg21-20020a05600c3c9500b0035283e7a012so5582146wmb.0; Sat, 05 Feb 2022 06:32:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=2YffGzmTy5wYwzq2k3T5w2BRK+1d/sI06kNAxHtw4ro=; b=mrB0msmC8b3YdKE6/o6+9hFnFudo284cpy2sMTkT6zyv91V5acZy0WxvCKFZNIEryi F8mtg1gco+gLp9+Aw1wRco30IAyVUXFB3SWgJgv9KOrgLjm5gED2uh9TI+AVP+wJ9oVn V5NWLu4f5DwFqYwc0ghI/L03CLKXKj2CW5NLf8wFOYVqAAfTuZxsr1DIrokD17M4erxr Fb7m9UJ53kIrys184CxqMFONc+xTaM6uPU4PfwugVMdIVMLX3cSEUFy9m7J2JMFdq70o IZSxL/O/OUASm9Em0STeQOZ2zA55pNqxl7crj3ejMJQXHg03G4mur3jhmigeyon6h+r0 cLNQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=2YffGzmTy5wYwzq2k3T5w2BRK+1d/sI06kNAxHtw4ro=; b=t8zpZ3Z+o4sftUmADnIGRYIiw45ONuhuHV8mFdAKb5OXXu2pTSiSDt0iorpbwvw4Pu q3PNmf9F2pPH6slBXyqWjK65ujuVm/cbeDuaqfPwer6kY8ENRc1A3YQgI124sI2vSmrx CLp164PSwR1N6ZMzh6Qov3CFpedVtCCyxTk/WO+xfACKQmosi6WwyBAMOtGflRA7Cn0j pKu/qI6FVgOB+rMsMaTFf2QDYUZYzEz6HNEQwNrXjlTvzFvd70/Y6HTJ4Ecqd0LOPWsh u9r876L2A6/3elGZryD4A3iEKFg7nmalguAgeZC0B9MgafNmBbPfriGK8QNxnwwzi+kC cpCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531rRIhmty3DXCD5hfvAHdnEucrcNpEORVm/7Uyz8+l9UEfcKDGq E5+AMt9Jv7jsgSb0qzJSOHc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyCn5gWUxWm+rcCr2w5jbxo8TgCRLnIsqLX0ylVvMBH780imRHeQREdA+bm3ibiObE6rEO0qQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:6028:: with SMTP id az40mr6696570wmb.33.1644071528674; Sat, 05 Feb 2022 06:32:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-78-145-97-89.as13285.net. [78.145.97.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m28sm13329267wms.34.2022.02.05.06.32.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 05 Feb 2022 06:32:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2022 14:32:06 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/32] 5.15.20-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220204091915.247906930@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220204091915.247906930@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 10:22:10AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.20 release. > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:19:05 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 62 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 100 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/708 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/710 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/712 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip