From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A85AC433FE for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 15:11:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1581559AbiAYPKw (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:10:52 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46862 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1581504AbiAYPH5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:07:57 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com (mail-wr1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4852BC06173B; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 07:07:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id k18so20457312wrg.11; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 07:07:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Q/fYKtq/uNf0miY8CtdiX8sLBbDL2BMLOTm05YpJTQM=; b=CbydCRkPrgyu1CJCN2XMMm5A9DbRZp8I0x3XANUUCYcj6A2hdojUL3yDx6SSL3mGTt ZGTmca6lkB48QwjeFZ3y8CcfcvB0+Q9IZ4FOhq9krgOVORSprKeiV9LtfUFtmDH4xxNZ TrKcfNm1KzvGR7Ms74iXv4c2MjGZcpG/C/gbXwjEWHuwj46iVitff6wqqT+OWarQaBED 1BZScYr8Q4rscmPXmCx2xPCMdehBB4liaKI21pIQopgLhtkkk05SQWJ/vcrAfHClOiAP gA2UY+1063GTVyj7C/RNjhhNaHI7XxcQu8PtZVy7Re1TlwtB0H6xeuEbhqv+Vpg8vgt3 5Jtw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Q/fYKtq/uNf0miY8CtdiX8sLBbDL2BMLOTm05YpJTQM=; b=qFzd0i/Ut+H8UIiStblgSAV0xMtNAr8vXF42GE6NZoWpSvQHTyRhCQN/FjdV2dcEuL fGsQ9/rJbyHmKVishpnjHi6kfNbcuUb7SJLokZFWHOeXjaxV763WdgPRjBcQAxHnaJhY sOEsYJLkyh6a5SYGmTIOsvdxL0bosMh4/qwsPAWlgQuYbGs+srrABDqrEHQ228QIMoAm E0G538nMN4Hj79z86A3ZQjpS24vGCeHEfeL5o34H1LmqtWM9p4azWl20ipawoiJLv5Bd PzgJ5Lt+hFbHXqzKvRDVfT4LqoPC44y94JwbNooCWDnfQiZeYu98V1xbdunEQzpTcu+m Ypiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531XQOZ6N0YsZEDtZ2nIacZUKabDMX6OTyf+/n/xKj8vA9RRnRnv 3Nc6G8d79pfoq+Bon1KwN6o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJytssNoYrdxhSp9bU/5zbsjnmIBG7CPAKSfSeYMNNA0Ue87xjlMTLE0IH/WRYTdG7gdYxEwag== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1e10:: with SMTP id bj16mr10440979wrb.536.1643123273741; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 07:07:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-2-98-43-34.as13285.net. [2.98.43.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l13sm21868193wry.87.2022.01.25.07.07.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 07:07:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 15:07:51 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/239] 4.19.226-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220124183943.102762895@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220124183943.102762895@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 07:40:38PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.226 release. > There are 239 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:39:11 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 116 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/651 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip