From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B93C5DF62 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 00:46:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235406AbiAZAqC (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 19:46:02 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38778 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231603AbiAZAqB (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 19:46:01 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com (mail-wr1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEEBAC06161C for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 16:46:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id h21so5327190wrb.8 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 16:46:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=philpotter-co-uk.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=qu6RcOEnnJ7n1O+3zkO2VX/ZPqBKZq4dTc8Y7asn2hs=; b=DUPTpJjYxMkSVGLerpRQE4ciZdIEeO7DCTe20SUYDzzU5zRiPnaAZcBdarIrOXCwXb VFv0TV6wlrXZ3hOFzS8GBkRtGztDGn8jWDl1kB+E9Rw91/ghpapnt7QFFj8Evki2gEc+ WgtA/0tIlSZFMCz/tjeKLF+Kn7/rkC5831FSnwjL1f9qb5ZubTVMVNUCeYu0r32D7bXs 3tUedzQJmnvHF2mtABtYHGLU29PTEhqPjlRG6GWo2xr/fYOWb7daqSknepMULVbKTdRX jcMd2o/YVWjBAT4gP9P16cC15ZEpRjL6Rj8FA3Zw66C1KSwXe7f5xOIRe3U0VAoWrZc0 gysg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=qu6RcOEnnJ7n1O+3zkO2VX/ZPqBKZq4dTc8Y7asn2hs=; b=rZl7OV5fEWPuxVnopw8bUo8M7M2ZX3uxYN7GedbvteBPi1ovAK5pqRxZsnaRouFUQn s4l6s4S5GyOwcrngN5FwXEYES2y+X9CMW2afRVhckMzf+XWBjP3fFsrD5NyCRfu+i9K8 eIu8NKMTuD0qQ+zS0vpqpQ0NPo52Z06NY7XiKin6fxA2MsPPa/CX5oVAGFxXg1da4OQZ Hi+wOeb1MvvA09IXFniPaQoPdrvBNK5Qt1OVtLrBKi+6x6WxvSqfgpi1xSzNWJmEKD/x 4AagPYGQXv5kzMCqglpcM8a9fzsEdplRCzZgezd8yN3Jph0TmF2V0vwZos84vUNj2ZjV KuAA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531vW7k1pQVVO8CpYZ9yo0GvdMt7IbenF7MzUJioqih00OVGiBZi p5XUO09909CCeL8wbT12pf6x1Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz6AXD0tkjXtIWSiI3DHUpUliN8lfcnXu80abGd/+D5nNzMgi0yDhedkdHkX2Qn9hdx95Hx9w== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5585:: with SMTP id i5mr19942033wrv.174.1643157959373; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 16:45:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from equinox (2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.a.1.e.e.d.f.d.0.b.8.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa. [2001:8b0:dfde:e1a0::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w8sm18385528wre.83.2022.01.25.16.45.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 16:45:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 00:45:57 +0000 From: Phillip Potter To: Greg KH Cc: dan.carpenter@oracle.com, Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net, straube.linux@gmail.com, martin@kaiser.cx, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paskripkin@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Cleanup and removal of DBG_88E macro Message-ID: References: <20220124224415.831-1-phil@philpotter.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 04:33:13PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 10:44:05PM +0000, Phillip Potter wrote: > > This series does a few things in order to effect the removal of the > > DBG_88E macro: > > > > (1) It removes previously converted calls for consistency. > > (2) It removes all current DBG_88E calls. > > (3) It removes all aliased DBG_88E calls. > > (4) It removes the GlobalDebugLevel flag and the file that defines it. > > > > By its very nature, it is a large patchset, so I've tried to group as > > appropriate. I went by file as I did the work, which led to over 40 > > patches originally, so I've listed the largest C files as their own > > patches and then grouped everything else by subdir which gives closer > > sizes for the other patches. > > Can you rebase this on my staging-testing branch? It no longer applies > :( > > thanks, > > greg k-h Hi Greg, Yes, of course - this was to supersede the previous 'conversion' patches I sent so that is probably why it doesn't apply. Sorry, I did e-mail but I should probably have made this clearer. I will fix it up over the next few days, as it needs other changes anyway. Many thanks. Regards, Phil