From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xiyu Yang <xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn>,
Xin Xiong <xiongx18@fudan.edu.cn>, Xin Tan <tanxin.ctf@gmail.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
whitehat002 <hackyzh002@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] moxart: fix potential use-after-free on remove path
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 08:33:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfJK4tRVPFszo+z3@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFrQ+1icC-qO6Oo4DAhZYVt9oOSZiKs0qRFMwKdq5=X1Hw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 03:24:05PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 14:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 01:41:27PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 08:59, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It was reported that the mmc host structure could be accessed after it
> > > > was freed in moxart_remove(), so fix this by saving the base register of
> > > > the device and using it instead of the pointer dereference.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> > > > Cc: Xiyu Yang <xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn>
> > > > Cc: Xin Xiong <xiongx18@fudan.edu.cn>
> > > > Cc: Xin Tan <tanxin.ctf@gmail.com>
> > > > Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> > > > Cc: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
> > > > Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
> > > > Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > > > Reported-by: whitehat002 <hackyzh002@gmail.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c | 9 +++++----
> > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c
> > > > index 16d1c7a43d33..f5d96940a9b8 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c
> > > > @@ -697,6 +697,7 @@ static int moxart_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > {
> > > > struct mmc_host *mmc = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> > > > struct moxart_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> > > > + void __iomem *base = host->base;
> > > >
> > > > dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> > > >
> > > > @@ -707,10 +708,10 @@ static int moxart_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > mmc_remove_host(mmc);
> > > > mmc_free_host(mmc);
> > > >
> > > > - writel(0, host->base + REG_INTERRUPT_MASK);
> > > > - writel(0, host->base + REG_POWER_CONTROL);
> > > > - writel(readl(host->base + REG_CLOCK_CONTROL) | CLK_OFF,
> > > > - host->base + REG_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> > >
> > > Rather than doing it like this, I think it would be easier to move
> > > mmc_free_host() below this part. That's usually what mmc host drivers
> > > do clean up things in ->remove().
> > >
> > > > + writel(0, base + REG_INTERRUPT_MASK);
> > > > + writel(0, base + REG_POWER_CONTROL);
> > > > + writel(readl(base + REG_CLOCK_CONTROL) | CLK_OFF,
> > > > + base + REG_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> > > >
> >
> > Ok, I can do that, I didn't know if it would cause any functionality
> > changes, so I was trying to preserve the same logic that the driver
> > currently has.
>
> Yes, but it's most likely just a simple mistake that was made by the
> original author.
>
> >
> > Do you have this device to test this with?
>
> No, I don't.
>
> Although, I am confident that it should work fine too.
Great, now sent v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220127071638.4057899-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-27 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-14 7:59 [PATCH] moxart: fix potential use-after-free on remove path Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-21 12:41 ` Ulf Hansson
2022-01-21 13:54 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-01-21 14:24 ` Ulf Hansson
2022-01-27 7:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YfJK4tRVPFszo+z3@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hackyzh002@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tanxin.ctf@gmail.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=xiongx18@fudan.edu.cn \
--cc=xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn \
--cc=yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox