Re: [PATCH 2/5] staging: fbtft: Deduplicate driver registration macros

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:36:07PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Greg,
> 
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 06:51:58PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > The two macros FBTFT_REGISTER_DRIVER and FBTFT_REGISTER_SPI_DRIVER
> > contain quite some duplication: Both define an spi driver and an of device
> > table and the differences are quite subtle.
> > 
> > So create two new macros and use both twice.
> > 
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220118181338.207943-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> 
> You picked this patch into your staging-next branch, I guess from the
> original submission. Not sure how Mark wants to continue with the series
> from this thread, but at least my plan was that he will create an
> immutable branch on top of 5.17-rc2 (assuming 5.17-rc2 will contain
> "staging: fbtft: Fix error path in fbtft_driver_module_init()") with the
> remaining 4 patches in this series.

That's fine, I can pull from that.

> In a private mail you agreed to this procedure, but this didn't stop you
> taking this patch?! What is your plan here? The obvious (to me) options
> are:
> 
>  - Delay this series until after the next merge window.
>  - You back out this patch from staging-next and ack here for Mark to
>    apply it to an immutable branch.
>  - You keep this patch in staging-next and still ack here for Mark to
>    apply it to an immutable branch. Then the patch would be included
>    twice.

Included twice is fine, or I can revert it in the staging tree.

Don't let staging tree issues prevent you from doing real work in the
other part of the kernel, I can manage merges and other issues like this
very easily.

thanks,

greg k-h