Re: [PATCH v9 40/43] x86/sev: Register SEV-SNP guest request platform device

Borislav Petkov
2022-02-06T20:05:28Z

On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 11:18:01AM -0600, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> Version 2 of GHCB specification provides Non Automatic Exit (NAE) that can
^ ^ ^
the a event type

> be used by the SEV-SNP guest to communicate with the PSP without risk from
> a malicious hypervisor who wishes to read, alter, drop or replay the
> messages sent.
>
> SNP_LAUNCH_UPDATE can insert two special pages into the guest’s memory:
> the secrets page and the CPUID page. The PSP firmware populate the contents

"populates"

> of the secrets page. The secrets page contains encryption keys used by the
> guest to interact with the firmware. Because the secrets page is encrypted
> with the guest’s memory encryption key, the hypervisor cannot read the
> keys. See SEV-SNP firmware spec for further details on the secrets page
> format.
>
> Create a platform device that the SEV-SNP guest driver can bind to get the
> platform resources such as encryption key and message id to use to
> communicate with the PSP. The SEV-SNP guest driver provides a userspace
> interface to get the attestation report, key derivation, extended
> attestation report etc.

...

> +static int __init init_snp_platform_device(void)

snp_init_platform_device()

> +{
> + struct snp_guest_platform_data data;
> + u64 gpa;
> +
> + if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SEV_SNP))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + gpa = get_secrets_page();
> + if (!gpa)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + data.secrets_gpa = gpa;
> + if (platform_device_add_data(&guest_req_device, &data, sizeof(data)))
> + goto e_fail;
> +
> + if (platform_device_register(&guest_req_device))
> + goto e_fail;
> +
> + pr_info("SNP guest platform device initialized.\n");
> + return 0;
> +
> +e_fail:
> + pr_err("Failed to initialize SNP guest device\n");
> + return -ENODEV;

So when someone tries to debug why the platform device doesn't register
properly, this error message is ambiguous and two of the error paths
don't even issue one.

Either issue a different error message before you return each time or
remove it completely and let someone who really needs it, add it.

I'd vote for former...

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.