From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: defer_console_output: do not assume interrupts disabled
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 16:04:07 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfzP50vDiJiaRVCr@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220203112915.1350753-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
On (22/02/03 12:35), John Ogness wrote:
> With commit 458df9fd4815 ("printk: remove separate printk_sched
> buffers and use printk buf instead") defer_console_output() was
> changed to no longer disable interrupts. However, it used the
> function __this_cpu_or(), which assumes interrupts disabled. That
> also should have been changed to this_cpu_or().
>
> Although defer_console_output() is mostly used when interrupts are
> disabled, this is not always the case. One example is
> get_random_bytes(), which is often called with interrupts enabled.
>
> get_random_bytes()
> warn_unseeded_randomness()
> printk_deferred()
>
> Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-04 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-03 11:29 [PATCH] printk: defer_console_output: do not assume interrupts disabled John Ogness
2022-02-03 11:33 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-04 7:04 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2022-02-07 9:46 ` [PATCH v2] printk: defer_console_output: use atomic update John Ogness
2022-02-10 15:47 ` Petr Mladek
2022-02-11 11:22 ` John Ogness
2022-02-11 11:23 ` [PATCH v3] printk: use atomic updates for klogd work John Ogness
2022-02-14 5:35 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-02-15 15:26 ` Petr Mladek
2022-02-14 5:32 ` [PATCH v2] printk: defer_console_output: use atomic update Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-02-14 5:35 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YfzP50vDiJiaRVCr@google.com \
--to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox