public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	kim.phillips@amd.com, acme@redhat.com, jolsa@redhat.com,
	songliubraving@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 11/12] perf tools: Improve error handling of AMD Branch Sampling
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 11:17:53 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yg0HkUzDlkD4nqNs@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220208211637.2221872-12-eranian@google.com>

Em Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 01:16:36PM -0800, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> Improve the error message printed by perf when perf_event_open() fails on
> AMD Zen3 when using the branch sampling feature. In the case of EINVAL, there
> are two main reasons: frequency mode or period is smaller than the depth of
> the branch sampling buffer (16). The patch checks the parameters of the call
> and tries to print a relevant message to explain the error:
> 
> $ perf record -b -e cpu/branch-brs/ -c 10 ls
> Error:
> AMD Branch Sampling does not support sampling period smaller than what is reported in /sys/devices/cpu/caps/branches.
> 
> $ perf record -b -e cpu/branch-brs/ ls
> Error:
> AMD Branch Sampling does not support frequency mode sampling, must pass a fixed sampling period via -c option or cpu/branch-brs,period=xxxx/.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
> [Rebased on commit 9fe8895a27a84 ("perf env: Add perf_env__cpuid, perf_env__{nr_}pmu_mappings")]
> Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index d42f63a484df..7311e7b4d34d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -2857,6 +2857,12 @@ static bool is_amd_ibs(struct evsel *evsel)
>  	return evsel->core.attr.precise_ip || !strncmp(evsel->pmu_name, "ibs", 3);
>  }
>  
> +static bool is_amd_brs(struct evsel *evsel)
> +{
> +	return ((evsel->core.attr.config & 0xff) == 0xc4) &&
> +	       (evsel->core.attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK);
> +}
> +

Well, this assumes we're on x86_64, right? Shouldn't we have some extra
condition using perf_env routines to check we're on x86_64.

Did a quick check and powerpc also supports PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK

⬢[acme@toolbox perf]$ find arch/ -name "*.c" | xargs grep PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c:		if (event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK) {
arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c:	if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK) {
arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c:					PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK |
arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c: * in PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK sample may vary.
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c:	 * - set 'sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK' and
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c:		.sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK,
⬢[acme@toolbox perf]$

arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c:

                if (event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK) {
                        struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw;
                        cpuhw = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
                        power_pmu_bhrb_read(event, cpuhw);
                        data.br_stack = &cpuhw->bhrb_stack;
                }

>  int evsel__open_strerror(struct evsel *evsel, struct target *target,
>  			 int err, char *msg, size_t size)
>  {
> @@ -2971,6 +2977,14 @@ int evsel__open_strerror(struct evsel *evsel, struct target *target,
>  					return scnprintf(msg, size,
>  	"AMD IBS may only be available in system-wide/per-cpu mode.  Try using -a, or -C and workload affinity");
>  			}
> +			if (is_amd_brs(evsel)) {
> +				if (evsel->core.attr.freq)
> +					return scnprintf(msg, size,
> +	"AMD Branch Sampling does not support frequency mode sampling, must pass a fixed sampling period via -c option or cpu/branch-brs,period=xxxx/.");
> +				/* another reason is that the period is too small */
> +				return scnprintf(msg, size,
> +	"AMD Branch Sampling does not support sampling period smaller than what is reported in /sys/devices/cpu/caps/branches.");
> +			}
>  		}
>  
>  		break;
> -- 
> 2.35.0.263.gb82422642f-goog

-- 

- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-16 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-08 21:16 [PATCH v6 00/12] perf/x86/amd: Add AMD Fam19h Branch Sampling support Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] perf/core: add perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields() helper Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] x86/cpufeatures: add AMD Fam19h Branch Sampling feature Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] perf/x86/amd: add AMD Fam19h Branch Sampling support Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] perf/x86/amd: add branch-brs helper event for Fam19h BRS Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] perf/x86/amd: enable branch sampling priv level filtering Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] perf/x86/amd: add AMD branch sampling period adjustment Stephane Eranian
2022-02-09 15:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-04 15:45     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-09 23:03       ` Stephane Eranian
2022-03-15 12:08         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-17 17:11           ` Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] perf/x86/amd: make Zen3 branch sampling opt-in Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] ACPI: add perf low power callback Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] perf/x86/amd: add idle hooks for branch sampling Stephane Eranian
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] perf tools: Improve IBS error handling Stephane Eranian
2022-02-09 15:47   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-03-15  6:49     ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-03-15  2:01   ` Stephane Eranian
2022-03-15  6:23     ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-03-15  7:12       ` Stephane Eranian
2022-03-15  7:45   ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-03-16  0:03     ` Stephane Eranian
2022-03-16 11:07       ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-03-16 11:16         ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] perf tools: Improve error handling of AMD Branch Sampling Stephane Eranian
2022-02-16 14:17   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2022-02-08 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] perf report: add addr_from/addr_to sort dimensions Stephane Eranian
2022-02-16 14:21   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yg0HkUzDlkD4nqNs@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox