From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6803BC433EF for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 14:51:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241024AbiBQOvO (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:51:14 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:44950 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242173AbiBQOuw (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:50:52 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C9BF29E940; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 06:50:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA2C761E03; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 14:50:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79F96C340E8; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 14:50:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1645109436; bh=FIN1JYSGbW2v56DyB+Gdsuvo/xYvrAhBtJD3iJLWu34=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=xEZICcpcXD/dxa5D8Nc86ZgTMR9qnd/ynRNb8yIRv2BS1zmSPDa06w9O07Lf2auqr h4RCNumfpQC7hd1uZ6piyTC7DSwNIUZSl4U7hh5KNDm/4Ha6U8GMAg41q2mTw76Ovy 6nABBhjpE5bObzBlMy8iAb8vLtm2olholT4ZlrHI= Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 15:50:32 +0100 From: Greg KH To: "Starke, Daniel" Cc: "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , "jirislaby@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tty: n_gsm: fix encoding of control signal octet bit DV Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 02:03:37PM +0000, Starke, Daniel wrote: > > > > All of these are patch 1/1, which is odd :( > > > > > > > > Please renumber them properly and resend. > > > > > > All these patches are based on the current version of tty-next and are > > > completely independent from each other. The only common part is the > > > file they apply to. Therefore, this is not a patch series. Would you > > > still suggest to apply a different numbering? > > > > Yes, please send them as a patch series, numbered correctly, as a whole > > series of patches, all listed as 1/1 does not do good things for our > > tools. > > I have noticed that all patches have been sent in one thread. This was not > my intention. I see two options here now: > 1. Resend all patches one by one as they are completely independent. > 2. Create a patch series. > > And the following two variants in case of option 2: > a. Just renumber the subjects and resend all (i.e. without a cover letter). This is fine, and the easiest for everyone involved, as git makes it automatic. thanks, greg k-h