From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1D8C433EF for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2022 14:02:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1377397AbiBHOCq (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2022 09:02:46 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51340 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344364AbiBHOCm (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2022 09:02:42 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92502C03FED0; Tue, 8 Feb 2022 06:02:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id v12so2231304wrv.2; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 06:02:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Xp9QZN/2z/upaKAhd3EP5sH3V0LGEoUW36DmbK5D1mg=; b=ksZMV3wZESIE8s3J+vkEoZkwAmwMNgXzV9D6ABMTidn81xM22dEolwar416EYM0ixW X9glk6wkCWMndCidF8Yx/ulOlgs/9T6gVVnFXJnbze1EaQ1TZgIVm5jFZT/jvpQTCPxr 8GVVXnDR5G2hiLdT2LVRg8opk0K/hGxyMx1GQsvtU7T0C3kOLhch6NFxiO+cxrBMD/SD o/mPZuSNF7sxcraugnXC75Y/grsfqMHVxg5SwJ+R64AN3ldEr7MDQa0DilIs7FtPkLQp CvipfInGq0fJ5mRKXollmJTSwtco25lCmOUhu4UM9QXesusAgWL8nXDQktewIv6RMaan FpKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Xp9QZN/2z/upaKAhd3EP5sH3V0LGEoUW36DmbK5D1mg=; b=RODyjfBn4+fdb1RCQHhjLMoE4ckmwrwohbZe023qpeBmbJjcC8HGgTOwaLBDXQbXKJ tcDn0vHRtLMYlSOZSXHLU89C1HE1JpeCRIxnabbUOhTUxNBqEAM6V8HXrzbnPs7ZNguD N/CeXqjZI334TyJhWjkhh9CK3UrZ7XbDVFSisyp8FShpc+S9obrn1X0HllEzHiwu7eey kxTaxdsRRH0B0VxM/XQiv6TN1U3eToJUF9XrT6YEwRSu5HqcxWAgt4ZR7TSE/7wFrQSf a9Prx49oE1nn3bcyn3NxZIXAsJi2WBPDyGJaJYgWmcb1kRI6+eepo+lpXGYGS974Eo/8 NMvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530T3GQJByYrHrz+6ZjYCI1Vf22BxL9yF5dMuHsx8dC6YFdjUP+A jHmYr1xx/xs75op1L8N+3wo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxvppN8OLWxCr62/0Hv9hDWKUKj61tfD4E/YEG8VR8gsHj0IZwiv4IYdKRcs/NueVeFgvyXmg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f90c:: with SMTP id b12mr3624219wrr.97.1644328960198; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 06:02:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-78-145-97-89.as13285.net. [78.145.97.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h4sm15477041wre.0.2022.02.08.06.02.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 08 Feb 2022 06:02:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 14:02:38 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/86] 4.19.228-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220207103757.550973048@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220207103757.550973048@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 12:05:23PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.228 release. > There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Feb 2022 10:37:42 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 116 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/722 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip