From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DE4C433FE for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2022 13:59:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1377226AbiBHN7f (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2022 08:59:35 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49558 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1358099AbiBHN7d (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2022 08:59:33 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35415C03FECE; Tue, 8 Feb 2022 05:59:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id c192so12241242wma.4; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 05:59:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=r0hF5ZRTXwpGB8Z1rBOeeLEYfkPvVonZLdA9UEgNhqw=; b=Bbw7NflQ70eSn3rN/iwnYlv4e9SlAWz2F2aTCUkdUQ9R4xLmM8bAqPzKWLtPeSeNro ed2YrKex4bkyihHBsXcUZUrjh0iwbHue6ae0L2FuiIkmcABet21PLQZpV7WuZxDQcy/o JtFeGJMMkvP6FH9hj3SbvHuYQxGuScvy9Tex0YIO+yPhinoOrscHeXgrZbzEei8I36r2 DNSrQjSPf8SN0Ua8jjrfxc7QNXzCWaT3vXcFtzpVVqzEvgySFNKW/EtMaRx3oBGCNcTM 0CVV/RQ3iREmDcxs0KRP1Xw2dyNrQ81IYpdiLz4iNeBehQYHmmEvubkbunvgOV5Vf4TZ Lrrg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=r0hF5ZRTXwpGB8Z1rBOeeLEYfkPvVonZLdA9UEgNhqw=; b=eJND3yRoZMVvlgn+aQ9HgDMaLVTbl9Zdbfe6H0vtcI33x67i4tCmAp/IiAS/5w/MVX 65CVflxIU9agp+yDN7ZvoX9WRJsNoEnQTPl+9s9gQ6KIU3Zfh1CNy2Jn1kQm/IStM06U HdTwniB6ib1Ymy00KJyiyIC9OIN+NaXMgFeiNNvOBGKnUxNzYfOQ5lp+dcD1jMdEyTYx WUKxMV9YhBQr0NGLQablTstR7XmVKxOEx7aqJLmTUQP9B+IUpb4wQvLIonjDf7rHO0vo jdOpNHBxneZ4bYrEn9fjdzt8rLtUUbGoLELFl46ysH3JOC593guEn03TPW0TVm2/94hS k7yg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53396DuIz2LD6QqeTyKd9nv98c/XmFz6KL1fQFLQGHt00DPenQ47 9FX8kxyf28swkD1vjf4GqXg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwJwtce+XPvjrqhfnhiTU3vMRDenSOoJG/GpYYWqoF1cJa4dzHMh0DbY5X5r2yRl6ozoGncgw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3b9b:: with SMTP id n27mr1143539wms.14.1644328770736; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 05:59:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-78-145-97-89.as13285.net. [78.145.97.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x5sm3205272wrv.63.2022.02.08.05.59.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 08 Feb 2022 05:59:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 13:59:28 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/44] 5.4.178-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220207103753.155627314@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220207103753.155627314@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 12:06:16PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.178 release. > There are 44 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Feb 2022 10:37:42 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 65 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 107 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/723 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip