From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EFEC433F5 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2022 14:01:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1377421AbiBHOBH (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2022 09:01:07 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50400 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1377294AbiBHOBG (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Feb 2022 09:01:06 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com (mail-wr1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCEACC03FED2; Tue, 8 Feb 2022 06:01:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id w11so30955138wra.4; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 06:01:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=4FtU9kX5hrkDZtN795Al3MMAz8CfFhP/v7tRtMsIPlo=; b=eBuK6MSuOTfOj3zN1jc4QcazeyEbXboPZ9f9o5uRh4twyQWgDxZdwJywjyQmcIcfQp YidLOtSsNzpCkjrPUZFKnKwVukz9WVNt7D45DIOcH9xX/AbR1El0rTeR4Vpnb+JL0vXM aQpS0FBRQaRUNzmTWdhwqL3Nh9Luaq7iVE8vyl0LqFarsnjBig/fJZA4WWkvkWejH2SU VJO3KWFzvMGKPz+owfuLTcvetKMSV7jGn2Kb9Kn6Ekij/R8ObX5m60gNZCB1SZPPJRHi Ey7PUSKx8D4IQRBPLcCVMyDeCW8ZQgFXptVdE4jUcfudpq9cDX6EBdorWe+u8eSKSwka Ka0g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=4FtU9kX5hrkDZtN795Al3MMAz8CfFhP/v7tRtMsIPlo=; b=SDVm4b/vOEkufr0oT+4klDlvkZdGrLWxXybscGODbWFIxPBt9QV1uUaISRy1I/7uuO 8tOxZkbnwvL1Me8V7bWVdsOx+qqjjnBD93Qwhf+M57Uo66TapkE7kJK0SohFHCPrkzBP WNFw5Fao0+8cSdHl6BlCGalKUtea5ZqCF2IRS3EI5whjrNRRNS8YPdEyM+QqX+FqjcFV RKrn2QLfA6zr4q6s8YT6ip/GdgEUwl/fZS3BWjCvgIl2t1j43GwHEBs1DlZyeSW5aSuk perPefwcghyw0bF3v+DXfYSriP6Hs1iG9CPsfZ4vvFHykBRjyEVKGZx/ELHOhGSk/kfq l62A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531g75YBDtZ5Tm386R3TVrPwye2vt6J9/mPSb/bIECOp2hc5CAsM OZ5SSYc8b2HWw4jr5cRQA54= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx/b8/Ihm2+3HfolHbcVtsskPDPftVKvbTACiryI5EOK83HEhrXjaYcIiS73SKmkpA4V5/4BA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6950:: with SMTP id r16mr3729979wrw.462.1644328862686; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 06:01:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-78-145-97-89.as13285.net. [78.145.97.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j19sm2540960wmq.17.2022.02.08.06.01.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 08 Feb 2022 06:01:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 14:01:00 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/74] 5.10.99-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220207103757.232676988@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220207103757.232676988@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 12:05:58PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.99 release. > There are 74 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Feb 2022 10:37:42 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/724 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/726 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip