From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C478C433FE for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243960AbiBJQBH (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Feb 2022 11:01:07 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:57514 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236524AbiBJQBF (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Feb 2022 11:01:05 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D433E5D; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:01:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id k18so10371188wrg.11; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:01:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Vv43b7pMEssZvUBn4Nz22cToBBcn/GrvYK44d38bgMA=; b=iezX7bTaaEgUbpDTHPwaaNSihcWk14mvfpkdoJGF6jQMtdtZWH6hVXrbjDwkIDugoP cnRQKw9lqry4Z9tVLDmVJDzhAzGAEAkxqLbAAIyhRYPA0zVdBpMI6id32d/iKkpsekGa xdYkQSm/xzQMTaAzjrRYKKYnoVN19NryvONwTW/TNrQavLy40g/yWVpBG1TxrdMT0+G7 4kvsYuCmvxWFdmoKuaaTkVV9u2HeMxU1chZsZNFcpOiZvbArgzJUVbBmBbs8P7pqjGrr cOTZ8LzCoTUVFNlZOxW5w1AUaWCN1GTK+KvfWne2qzclsPmgGPL5NFSp4eRDu0QBOEQF IIHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Vv43b7pMEssZvUBn4Nz22cToBBcn/GrvYK44d38bgMA=; b=SYJTmCCrLc3zyWSgDmWxbiZEkNdroH1VHtEi1HpUPBE88pmZEhGb79aNVoYkteAwvf Nx3r9yTImIChTcNtAqB4UEpWr42Gg2ilhhPe/TjdljULOHHVtpUqcNpDL5X7J+vBO8iE qO1mstdCHAVt8arH5VUkNbaxkjt+sA1TcZ0Wd+EGAFeTDTel2aNlK9sWewpaUQpvZ94U MBY3MSMC5nOe7Gdmk+qT0rHsXIKmCFTRMUV8hfKFMda63zLVtC/jUcQz6auRxXiRmYWl kCb6DM20pOM8C+egWeqTbNSNnB4bH+G7vS2ZK9D1RsoDlmYjrIenQob0JOitQKaWNoa6 bSKA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531cS6E7qrWWYNlGtKL8HI4y0uZ7aqqyPAiZ32zLFcpaWPYm/JYQ 37Pj3I6iboMY4KPVbZ0lxgA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzs9vfUPgIC0KdpPpzihhTIFuLANEm6zs3lJdOmM4a0p98gXdTlLFPpDZFtKJY8bsac68SgFw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:47cb:: with SMTP id o11mr6818424wrc.718.1644508864101; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:01:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-78-145-97-89.as13285.net. [78.145.97.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p3sm1939769wmq.40.2022.02.10.08.01.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:01:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:01:01 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/5] 5.15.23-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220209191249.980911721@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220209191249.980911721@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:25PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release. > There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 62 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 100 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/735 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/739 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/743 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip