From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, michals@xilinx.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: xilinx-cpm: Add support for Versal CPM5 Root Port
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 15:33:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yh+OUvLi56/H4l2z@lpieralisi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220215124606.28627-3-bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com>
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 06:16:06PM +0530, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> Xilinx Versal Premium series has CPM5 block which supports Root Port
> functioning at Gen5 speed.
>
> Xilinx Versal CPM5 has few changes with existing CPM block.
> - CPM5 has dedicated register space for control and status registers.
> - CPM5 legacy interrupt handling needs additional register bit
> to enable and handle legacy interrupts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-cpm.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Only a couple of very minor suggestions below.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-cpm.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-cpm.c
> index c7cd44ed4dfc..eb69f494571a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-cpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-cpm.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,10 @@
> #define XILINX_CPM_PCIE_MISC_IR_ENABLE 0x00000348
> #define XILINX_CPM_PCIE_MISC_IR_LOCAL BIT(1)
>
> +#define XILINX_CPM_PCIE_IR_STATUS 0x000002A0
> +#define XILINX_CPM_PCIE_IR_ENABLE 0x000002A8
> +#define XILINX_CPM_PCIE_IR_LOCAL BIT(0)
> +
> /* Interrupt registers definitions */
> #define XILINX_CPM_PCIE_INTR_LINK_DOWN 0
> #define XILINX_CPM_PCIE_INTR_HOT_RESET 3
> @@ -109,6 +113,7 @@
> * @intx_irq: legacy interrupt number
> * @irq: Error interrupt number
> * @lock: lock protecting shared register access
> + * @is_cpm5: value to check cpm version
> */
> struct xilinx_cpm_pcie {
> struct device *dev;
> @@ -120,6 +125,7 @@ struct xilinx_cpm_pcie {
> int intx_irq;
> int irq;
> raw_spinlock_t lock;
> + bool is_cpm5;
> };
>
> static u32 pcie_read(struct xilinx_cpm_pcie *port, u32 reg)
> @@ -285,6 +291,14 @@ static void xilinx_cpm_pcie_event_flow(struct irq_desc *desc)
> generic_handle_domain_irq(port->cpm_domain, i);
> pcie_write(port, val, XILINX_CPM_PCIE_REG_IDR);
>
> + if (port->is_cpm5) {
> + val = readl_relaxed(port->cpm_base + XILINX_CPM_PCIE_IR_STATUS);
> + if (val)
> + writel_relaxed(val,
> + port->cpm_base +
> + XILINX_CPM_PCIE_IR_STATUS);
> + }
> +
> /*
> * XILINX_CPM_PCIE_MISC_IR_STATUS register is mapped to
> * CPM SLCR block.
> @@ -484,6 +498,12 @@ static void xilinx_cpm_pcie_init_port(struct xilinx_cpm_pcie *port)
> */
> writel(XILINX_CPM_PCIE_MISC_IR_LOCAL,
> port->cpm_base + XILINX_CPM_PCIE_MISC_IR_ENABLE);
> +
> + if (port->is_cpm5) {
> + writel(XILINX_CPM_PCIE_IR_LOCAL,
> + port->cpm_base + XILINX_CPM_PCIE_IR_ENABLE);
> + }
> +
> /* Enable the Bridge enable bit */
> pcie_write(port, pcie_read(port, XILINX_CPM_PCIE_REG_RPSC) |
> XILINX_CPM_PCIE_REG_RPSC_BEN,
> @@ -504,6 +524,9 @@ static int xilinx_cpm_pcie_parse_dt(struct xilinx_cpm_pcie *port,
> struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> struct resource *res;
>
> + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "xlnx,versal-cpm5-host-1.00"))
> + port->is_cpm5 = true;
port->is_cpm5 = of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node,
"xlnx,versal-cpm5-host-1.00");
?
> + port->is_cpm5 = true;
> +
> port->cpm_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev,
> "cpm_slcr");
> if (IS_ERR(port->cpm_base))
> @@ -518,7 +541,14 @@ static int xilinx_cpm_pcie_parse_dt(struct xilinx_cpm_pcie *port,
> if (IS_ERR(port->cfg))
> return PTR_ERR(port->cfg);
>
> - port->reg_base = port->cfg->win;
> + if (!port->is_cpm5) {
Nit: I'd keep the check as above for consistency but it is not really
important:
if (port->is_cpm5)
...
else
...
> + port->reg_base = port->cfg->win;
> + } else {
> + port->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev,
> + "cpm_csr");
> + if (IS_ERR(port->reg_base))
> + return PTR_ERR(port->reg_base);
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -593,6 +623,7 @@ static int xilinx_cpm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> static const struct of_device_id xilinx_cpm_pcie_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "xlnx,versal-cpm-host-1.00", },
> + { .compatible = "xlnx,versal-cpm5-host-1.00", },
> {}
> };
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-02 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-15 12:46 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add support for Xilinx Versal CPM5 Root Port Bharat Kumar Gogada
2022-02-15 12:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: PCI: xilinx-cpm: Add " Bharat Kumar Gogada
2022-03-02 15:37 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2022-03-03 4:36 ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2022-02-15 12:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: xilinx-cpm: Add support for " Bharat Kumar Gogada
2022-03-02 15:33 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2022-03-03 9:25 ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2022-03-02 9:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Add support for Xilinx " Bharat Kumar Gogada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yh+OUvLi56/H4l2z@lpieralisi \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michals@xilinx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox