public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Mauri Sandberg <maukka@ext.kapsi.fi>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mv643xx_eth: handle EPROBE_DEFER
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 13:21:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YhOD3eCm8mYHJ1HF@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220221062441.2685-1-maukka@ext.kapsi.fi>

On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 08:24:41AM +0200, Mauri Sandberg wrote:
> Obtaining MAC address may be deferred in cases when the MAC is stored
> in NVMEM block and it may now be ready upon the first retrieval attempt
> returing EPROBE_DEFER. Handle it here and leave logic otherwise as it
> was.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mauri Sandberg <maukka@ext.kapsi.fi>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mv643xx_eth.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mv643xx_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mv643xx_eth.c
> index 105247582684..0694f53981f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mv643xx_eth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mv643xx_eth.c
> @@ -2740,7 +2740,10 @@ static int mv643xx_eth_shared_of_add_port(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	of_get_mac_address(pnp, ppd.mac_addr);
> +	ret = of_get_mac_address(pnp, ppd.mac_addr);
> +
> +	if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +		return ret;

Hi Mauri

There appears to be a follow on issue. There can be multiple ports. So
it could be the first port does not use a MAC address from the NVMEM,
but the second one does. The first time in
mv643xx_eth_shared_of_add_port() is successful and a platform device
is added. The second port can then fail with -EPROBE_DEFER. That
causes the probe to fail, but the platform device will not be
removed. The next time the driver is probed, it will add a second
platform device for the first port, causing bad things to happen.

Please can you add code to remove the platform device when the probe
fails.

	Andrew

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-21 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-21  6:24 [PATCH] net: mv643xx_eth: handle EPROBE_DEFER Mauri Sandberg
2022-02-21 12:21 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2022-02-21 18:25   ` Mauri Sandberg
2022-02-21 22:15     ` Andrew Lunn
2022-02-22  5:42       ` Mauri Sandberg
2022-02-23 14:23 ` [PATCH v2] net: mv643xx_eth: process retval from of_get_mac_address Mauri Sandberg
2022-02-24 16:57   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-02-24 17:43     ` Andrew Lunn
2022-02-24 18:20   ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YhOD3eCm8mYHJ1HF@lunn.ch \
    --to=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maukka@ext.kapsi.fi \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox